[–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

One more important piece unless I missed it, they were working on the proof using Codex, an openAI product. It’s not clear if openAI lifted their work directly from there.

Mentioning because many programs now include AI integrations with dubious privacy protections, so writing your research paper in ms word or overleaf could potentially expose your ideas to these companies. Back to typewriters?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    They could not pay them a salary or cancel the contract. But a one year postdoc contract is quite cheap compared to an international dispute, I guess this means pretty much take this money, do whatever you want and don't ever talk to us again.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Cofnas has been accused of promoting pseudoscientific ideas of racial difference in his online writings, and was reportedly among bloggers recommended to the Palantir founder Peter Thiel by a “race science” researcher.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 months ago

    Your post triggered our content filter, and was placed on hold by being temporarily removed, an admin will review it shortly to approve or deny it. Sorry for the inconvenience.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Great article! I’ve always been self-conscious about my weakness in math, and I’ve recently decided to really focus on improving, so this article came at the perfect time for me. I also think that here in the U.S., schools have been struggling with math education for a while, so hopefully this will make people take notice.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    This guy clearly doesn’t know how science works. One of the things I liked about the movie Oppenheimer was the way scientists were represented. And it was never just one guy in a basement. Collaboration is key.

    I’ll say it again because it doesn’t get said enough: Hegseth is an idiot.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Well, yeah, most of what separates which college a person goes to is money rather than skill; although we do like to pretend that prestigious schools only accept more skilled students.

    But I am curious about something. Do the fancy schools have the kind of catch-up programs and classes that community colleges do?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    I call this a win-win. The Pentagon loses access to some of the best and brightest minds, and the universities learn not to take money from a fickle, political body. It sucks for the people who had research depending on this funding, but with the exception of the 2 schools in blood-red Oklahoma these schools were all in blue states on Trump's shit list, they probably saw it coming.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    You’re going to need a gatekeeping system (entrance exam) between high school and college if you want students who can actually read, write, add, and subtract. High school education has mostly been gutted across the US.

    At many universities you’re still going to get students admitted on sports scholarships that don’t meet academic requirements. Sports brings in big money to universities.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    So you've got a bunch of kids walking out the door with D- in Trigonometry.

    I have no idea how that affects admissions at Berkeley, especially when the Op-Ed writer claims kids with straight As in Calc II who are getting passed over.

    The SAT doesn't even test for this. It caps out at Algebra and Geometry. Why go to bat for a program that is testing under what freshmen at Berkeley would be presumably be admitted for?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›