And watch the billionaires nod in agreement to more child labor lol

Did you read the whole thing? It's about a lot more, such as corporate control, economic hardship, and alienation. It's not a long read and you don't have to care or agree with the author, but this is a disservice to their post.

I don't disagree that LLMs are very useful when debugging and such, but it's disappointing that he talks down to people trying to do the right thing and fighting so we have jobs and we don't end the world. I'm not out there doing any of that but I appreciate folks that do.

I was thinking more that lots of people don't have the hardware required to begin with, and it's really hard to purchase now (especially in poorer countries like mine), hopefully memory prices will come down at some point after the bubble bursts so we can afford shit

Artisans own their tools, that's what makes them artisans (rather than wage workers). I believe after the bubble pops there will be legitimate uses for the tech, and we'll be able to run a pretty good iteration in our own hardware, but as it is now I'm uncomfortable with my employer having the power to decide whether I have the tools they want me to use for the job, whereas with code that's less of a concern.

It's more that ordering a crime is still illegal. If you tell a person to go and kill someone else you're still liable. In the case of using an LLM, considering our governments are trying to keep these companies not liable for anything, even assisting children to kill themselves, you'll likely be judged as a killer yourself anyway. But if the LLM company had some degree of responsibility, you'd still be held as ultimately responsible because the LLM presumably didn't come up with the crime, you did.

To reiterate what the other person was saying, if you print your own 3D model you can say you created the thing in addition to printing it. If you just download a model, regardless of license, and do no modifications, you just printed someone else's creation.

When you get an LLM to generate code for you, you can abbreviate that as "I generated this", which will be understood as using gen AI, saying you created it is misleading as we understand that as meaning you coded it yourself. Even technical leads shouldn't go around claiming everyone's work, their credit extends to their designs, direct contributions, leadership, mentoring, etc, they're not the sole creators of whatever project they lead.

Working exclusively with generated code would make you closer to a maintainer from a library you didn't write, you can put in the effort to understand what's going on and maybe even be confident enough that it's good for what it is, but that doesn't make you the creator, the same way reviewing a PR from a colleague doesn't make you the author of their code.

Or until it gaslights you into thinking that pizza (or a new one) is already blue

I think it depends on what happens in countries like China, as they develop more productive capacity in sectors like memory and graphic cards the prices will eventually go down, I hope they keep the components separate for non-datacenter customers but I guess time will tell, and sadly you might be right

Do you question the ethics of people doing gigs because their employers are trash?

How do you achieve that? Calling it out when it happens?

I don't like LLMs outside of debugging and the way it mimics human closeness creeps me out

It's more that most people would only associate them with that one project. It's not as bad as it could be, but for instance in the Ruby world everyone just thinks of Rails and, if they're aware of it, the main guy behind it flirting with white supremacy

It looks bad in the short/medium term, but the bubble will pop, it's only a matter of time until memory prices come down again and we move past the insanity of burning tokens like there's no tomorrow. I don't mean to downplay this though, lots of people and companies are struggling because of the AI bubble and the rush to build datacenters.