So, simply put (if I get it right), if you have a friend willing to pay the lowest lawyer wage to get you out, you can get out.
because reviewers felt obligated to verify the AI’s work on top of their own
Because you arr telling the dev to sign off on code made by something that is at best, a code-writer that doesn't just do what you tell it to do.
Nice. Is there terminal/native running software with something similar?
Other than just running the HTML+JS/TS project in a container.
Hehe! I have.
And what took the longest was for me to get used to the dual versioning of QML modules and fixing the UI code that was partially using stuff from both versions.
Business logic was pretty small for me but that was because other engineers had already written most of it in Maths.
Yeah, e.g. writing UI code takes a lot of time, while it tends to be pretty simple overall and that's why we have so many UI toolkits, to reduce the amount of writing required for UI.
Might as well just give me their money and call it a day. No real product required.
I can then "pay" that money to 10 other companies for nothing and then the govt. can pay my client for contracts of nothing.
And everyone can be a billionaire.
It's probably just Valve's competitors trying to dig up anyone they can to use to sue them, so that Valve has to reduce their work on Linux.
Microsoft probably asked their AI how to 1up Valve and got this solution.
They probably realised that the more funding that is available to Linux devs the faster their meticulously crafted backdoors would be found out and make it harder to spy on Linux users.
I use C++ regularly and never used the 3.
Saw std::valarray in some code once, but never used it myself.
I tend to avoid boost as much as I can.
Don't we all now?
systems my school was throwing away
I wish people threw away perfectly usable stuff in places I could easily find them.
Tell me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it be more expensive (and slow) than HDDs even at current prices?
This article does well at dispersing the rhetoric of "Valve brought gambling to the gaming scene".
Gambling and gatcha have been there for quite a while. Valve just spread it all over the world, before the Japanese gatcha companies could capture other markets and Valve made it much more convenient for people to lose their money on it.
Transferability is a right we believe should not be taken away
That's the real BS here.
This is the same language other "normal" companies use, to continue their evils. Guess the Valve PR people graduated from the same school.
If Valve wanted to let people transfer their NFTs, they would let them do so over other platforms. But they really just want the transaction fee profits.
While that part may bring them NYAG points, it's not getting "me" points.