Or failing that, just give me the fucking prompt and at least I’ll know if you understand the question.

This one's really nice. I should make this my go to response to anyone doing that.

Considering that despite going over lvl70, he decided with Catholic Priest instead of Saint,Warlock or Archmage, it should already be making you question his decision making ability.

nice—dick

So, an AI chatbot tasked to convince people to use more AI?
I'm going with that.

Turns out I came here to say the same thing as everyone.

AppImages are not in the same competition.
They have different uses and you would mostly not find out how many people are using them due to their nature of being very useful offline.

Over here, people usually sell that level of stuff to some known parts dealer for pretty cheap.
I am just a hoarder who has kept my last few phones hoping to some day be able to use their high quality cameras with something else.

And transfer all the pressure to your project's VCS maintainer, who is also being told by management to use AI?

At some point you need to start thinking whether the product your company wants you to make is really worth it.
You might not think about it right now, but you might, by the time your company starts paying you in AI token allocation.

What kind of web app is your company making that it somehow requires you to learn and use all the new frameworks?
And if you are having to learn the framework despite your product not requiring it, perhaps the priorities of your seniors are misguided or you are trying to fulfil the wrong JD (R&D perhaps? I would love such a job, but I won't be choosing JS either way).
It is the job of the management the place the correct person onto the correct position and if they are making you do something that is killing you, perhaps they need to be replaced. And if you always only cared about [paying the bills, well there will soon be more bills to pay, the way we are going.

I only had to use some plain JS for my website (not a web app though) and I recently had the opportunity to remove even that.

I am always happy learning new libraries and frameworks and technical concepts even if I only end up using them just in a single project. I am learning Lua just to be able to make an extension of a game I am not sure I will be playing 5 years down the line.

But I also rid myself of everything uninteresting. I forget the names of programming concepts, design patterns and language features that I am using regularly (sometimes to my own detriment), while associating the patterns to functional requirements in my mind.

When I feel cognitive load rising, I don't think of making the task simpler, but increasing my concentration, because that's what makes the work desirable to me. And there will always be something that will require you to load your brain as long as you want to create something with emphasis to quality.
Previously made processes will require reimagining the reasons behind their making and deconstructing them to create better processes. Undocumented code will have to be checked and the intent behind it be understood before checking to make sure that AI generated documentation represents the correct design. Even C++ developers moving to Rust will find out that there are more things that are not yet explicit enough and require reading and correlating to other functions in the codebase.

My takeaways:

1. Ecuador is a puppet state
2. The companies' end-game is to sell air.

There has been a longstanding trend of lowering quality bars.
And most of times, those lowering said bars, don't understand the implications well enough.

AI is giving more incentives to a greater variety of people to lower these bars, in favour of increasing output speed/quantity. And in turn, lowering of the quality bars is helping with proliferation of AI tools in mismatched places.

But the industry seems to have had the "quality" problem long before that.
Mainly thanks to failure of people testing methodologies, which end up being cracked by those, who train primarily for the test (using courses designed to train them only for the given test) and end up being disproportionately (test vs real work) evaluated.

Combine this with failure of workplace testing methodologies and overall company quality testing, we geg what we have now.

Should we go after amazon for encouraging gambling?

Amazon should be giving a full box of SSDs to every customer buying a dingle SSD, with 100% probability.

And complementary RAM

(3) APP.—The term “app” means a software application or electronic service that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device.

(4) APP STORE.—The term “app store” means a publicly available website, software application, or other electronic service that distributes and facilitates the download of an app from a third-party developer by a user of a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device.

100% sure they all come in the category of an "App Store" when convenient for the lobbyist.

Does the Court ask you?
Does the legislature?
Does Meta come to ask what you call an "App Store"?

2 factor authentication, only when you feel like it.

They might as well be piping the password to /dev/null