The author might even have read it after handing over a copy.
But that doesn't make, the "people who wrote them" having 'read the articles', because the "author" in this case is more like an "Editor".
What if they also got bombed as many as school-children get?
Yeah, that might make it easier when he feels the need to report the professor to the HOD.
Except it doesn't matter when the HOD just wants to shit on you, because they can just say that you are good at AI-ing and that's how you did it.
It is also cheaper to buy and run a CNC on Aluminium than on Iron/Steel, so for all those non-load-bearing applications...
That’s cryptographically signed and therefore strong evidence of what you wrote when, and what you were thinking.
This logic doesn't work out in the given place.
Cryptographical signatures are used to determine that the thingy was made by the person you trust.
Problem is, in this case, the creator of those commits is the one that is not being trusted.
The professor will just go, "Oh you made it with AI and then used git commit!".
I have had a similar experience in the past, where I made some MATLAB code for a Mathematics course, which the professor said I had copied from someone else (pre-AI times), because he had given the same assignment to other people in the university. This, he claimed without even looking at what I made and without remembering the specific question he had passed to me.
Yeah, that's right.
But are enough of the AI generation people going to understand the difference?
I feel like, due to the reduction of quality expectations, they will just end up feeling the same about this as we do about the previous one, despite the difference being visible as night and day for us.
Hey, 5 years ago, they couldn't even solve a HackerRank preliminary coding challenge.
The only problem I see with AI CEOs is that the biggest models will be available to those that already have loads of money, so the adversarial investors get to win.
What's the problem with the Anthropic one?
Of course everyone wants more W cubes! No?
But hey, at least when you tell them their mistake, they say, "You are absolutely correct!!"
I think Dillo might work fine too.
Not a modern browser though, as it hasn't been updated for HTML5.
The libraries you use might still be C/C++.