[–] 2 points 1 month ago

Nobody said anything about enforcing it. Just put it in the contribution guidelines!! Like for fucks sake, this is like saying you shouldn’t have a law saying you can’t murder people out at sea because it’s impossible to police. The threat of action is half of the reason people don’t do bad things. There’s ZERO REASON to not have it in the guidelines.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Sure, but that doesn’t mean that it can’t go into the contribution guidelines. If they don’t listen then ok, you remove commits that have claude watermarking. Without that guideline you can’t stop the PRs at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 223 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Why are these things being called actresses. It’s literally “ai video starts randomly speaking Cantonese”. It’s not an actress. It’s not acting.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    what can they do despite ban LLM usage altoguether (and per consequence get LLM generated code submitted anyway), they can't have a blacklist for models, or force contributors to run them on their local hardware.

    But they can? Like OP pointed out, wine forbids contributions from those that have seen Windows source code. How in the world are they supposed to enforce that? Turns out the open source community is pretty good at self enforcing.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›