Romance language is a correct term, but it always sounds to me like ‘my first language is the language of love 🎸’
Digching one of the genders looks better, but it will spark a huge war over which one to exclude (and I can totally understand that, at least from the side of women that are excluded by default in many languages)
Yeah, it doesn't withstand it, it just burns slowly because of moist in it. So even less would be enough, given time
It has to be KH sound like in jalapeño, just to confuse more
Isn't there an attempt to repurpose @ for gender-neutral? Looks awkward, too
Yeah, love me some more months in the calendar, too
The wording is pretty wild to me:
is required to implement appropriate technical and organisational security measures in order to prevent advertisements published there and containing sensitive data, in terms of Article 9(1) of that regulation, from being copied and unlawfully published on other websites.
Whatever can be accessed can be copied, there is nothing bar not publishing that can prevent it. Except if they call a pretty please in TOS an appropriate measure
At least they think they would, and then it's !leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world
On call is not really what we discuss here, emergency may require a trained person to at least identify as one and try helping. Of course it depends on the legislation
Well, there is context here, the logo 🤮
I wonder where the data comes from, considering in China there's supposedly 91% Han Chinese and that would be less diversity that South Korea
I mean I can’t
No need to read further, it's just an excuse, so it's you personally who is at fault ᐟˢ