[–] 2 points 3 days ago (1 child)

I'm not sure I follow your reasoning. You are not arguing against voting, but are arguing that voting doesn't work for the benefit of the working class.

Can you clarify what you mean in the first part of that statement? What are you saying you aren't arguing against with respect to voting? Most people would assume you are arguing against voting when you say that voting never works to the benefit of the working class.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Okay but if you are advocating for overthrowing the system, you don't need to dissuade people from voting during an election cycle. You can organize a revolution AND you can participate in the current system in a manner that leads to the best (suboptimal) outcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago

    I think it's unrealistic to think a new party would have been successful in 2020 and 2024, however, I think if he did choose to build a new party in 2016, the US would have had a third option for the 2028 presidential election. These things take time and we are now seeing what "could have been" from decisions ten years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Qgis has a great plugin for turning DEMs into 3d printable STL objects! If you play around with the vertical exaggeration, depending on how much elevation change the terrain has, you can print some AMAZING things!

    If you can get yourself a cheap 3d printer this is an excellent add-on to your hobby :)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    "Mercedes claims they have a total addressable market of $30 trillion by demonstrating that everyone has sold their vehicles and switched to driving a Mercedes on the new $20/month leasing program. Mercedes has not provided a response when asked how much their cars actually cost to own."

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›