It's not, labels were always written that way. They went into a box where the slide was facing down so the label was always visible at the top.
How is AI-generated content detected and what is the process for disputing such claims?
Besides the fact that I highly doubt this will ever pass...
I think if it did, it would greatly increase the adoption of decentralized platforms.
If websites become responsible for user-generated content, they will just refuse to allow user-generated content in the first place, leading to an explosion in alternative services that are not beholden to the actions of one company that could be compelled to act a certain way.
If your worried about us intelligence monitoring traffic then it’s not a good fit
source:
It's explained in great detail on the website
What is your definition of TV in this context? All of these are 55"+, some even show pictures of it in a living room...
no screenshots?
I think there is. I would say the connection is not that electron didn't exist before, but that now that ram prices are high, an increase in the number of electron apps becomes a problem because of the ram usage. Not that the usage wasn't a problem before, but that more people are using even more electron apps now than ever, hence their "industry standard" comment.
How would an independent investigation prove anything further?
There’s no proof anywhere that this is truthful, and no, pictures don’t lend credence.
What would you accept as proof then? Because to me it sounds like this logic implies nothing can be proven at all, ever.
Highly inflammatory clickbait title IMO