In my view, this way of thinking makes a less obvious mistake, which is also reproduced in the comments. It assumes that someone would change jobs only for a higher salary. However, some people would also accept a lower salary in exchange for better working conditions.

In the beginning we had aalib for rendering ASCII-art, which allowed saving GIMP images as ASCII art and playing movies in a text console with MPlayer. Then libcaca added colour support. And caca means poo in Latin languages like Spanish, Portuguese, Romanian or French, so...

There is no such thing as 'biological sex' or, as you put it, sex as part of your basic biology, like some sort of immutable biological property each individual gets alongside other biological traits, such as eye or hair color. Like something you cannot discuss because it would be like discussing how many fingers you have on your hand. Sex is a classification made by humans based on some loosely grouped and kind of varying physical traits, which are even not always used consistently to tell sexes apart.

The first argument in defense of biological sex is that people with a penis and testicles are inherently and biologically men and people with a vulva and vagina are biologically women. But, you know, even when they are not common, there are people who have both or none in varying degrees. This usually turns to "women are people with XX chromosomes and men are people with XY chromosomes". But people with XXY chromosomes (Klinefelter syndrome) and just X chromosomes (Turner syndrome) also exist. You may say those people will be men or women based on what their physical development will make them look like. But you can already see how this starts taking sex assignment into some subjective area and not a basic biology property anymore. Then, you also have De La Chapelle syndrome and Swyer syndrome, which are people with XX chromosomes developing physical traits traditionally considered male and people with XY chromosomes developing physical traits traditionally considered female, respectively. We can continue going over the dozens of different conditions that make it impossible to tell that someone has one unquestionable basic biological sex. You could tell those cases are very rare (if you consider 1 % of the population as very rare), but they do exist. And, since you want to appeal to biology, in science you cannot simply ignore a scenario because it's not favourable for you and claim that your theory still holds because it works for the majority. Sex is a spectrum and sex binarism is a social construct: https://doi.org/10.1038/518288a

The same way that there is also no such thing as "biological race" and I thought that debate was over decades ago: https://bioanth.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/AAPA_Biological_Race_1996.pdf

Once you start questioning the idea of sex and race as basic biology that cannot be argued, you start seeing how those ideas are harder to sustain and insisting in doing so will place you in, let's say, uncomfortable positions.

It was edited.

Are there other credible sources reporting the same claims made by the far-right propagandist pamphlet? And you still chose to link the far-right propagandist one?

eldebate.com is a far-right tabloid published by the Catholic Association of Propagandists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Debate_(Spain)#Website

Sorry, but I can't just believe every extraordinary claim that I see on social media, so I had to double-check it. In this case it seems to be true (although not his father but a "village strongman") and happened in Vietnam: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kids-cross-river-in-plastic-bag-school-video_n_5002877 https://vov.vn/tin-24h/chui-tui-nilon-vuot-suoi-lu-den-truong-nguoi-trong-cuoc-noi-gi-809014.vov Although quite old, so not sure if it's still happening.

Context: https://tuxcare.com/blog/the-great-kernel-cve-flood-of-2024/

Summary: After Linus's previous stance that security vulnerabilities are just bugs and don't require special treatment, the kernel's new policy is that almost every bug gets a CVE if it has the potential to become a security vulnerability.

The attendance list was discovered hard-coded in the HTML of the official dialog.org website.

That can't be true 🤦

I don't know if it's ironic or they really mean it, but it's published on Substack Nazi platformers, so who cares.

Bonus for the small fence around it which is almost collapsing.

Is that true? The article doesn't provide any reference to support that claim and the Portuguese Wikipedia only has a very brief mention at the 9th paragraph that it's also known by that name, but nothing about being its official name.