[–] 2 points 1 month ago*

By my experience, and most of my friends experience (as heavy smokers): the alcohol tends to override the weed very easily so it kinda feels like wasting the bud if you're getting drunk at the same time. If you smoke and only drink a little, the weed overpowers the alcohol.

There is however a golden sweet spot where the alcohol enhances the weed, making the psychedelic effects slightly more noticable and it does feel quite nice and chill. But it doesn't last for long and I've never been able to intentionally induce it. Sometimes happens when I've gotten a tiny bit drunk and am starting to sober up, and then smoke weed. Like after drinking a bit while out with mates, getting home, feeling slightly buzzed but not really drunk and then chill, hydrate and smoke. But again, never managed to get it to happen on purpose.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    There are no universal rules about this... like pretty much everything, depends on who you're talking to and who you want to make a positive impression on.

    Excessive amount of Emojis does seem to read as kinda juvenile, tone-deaf and Instagram-marketey to me at least.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    Look, sniff, and only then taste if you didn't detect anything. Do it with totally fresh stuff too so you learn what That's supposed to be like.

    That's why your mom had "the nose". Learn to use your senses.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    It usually gets complicated. We're at the point where you basically have to decide what level of unethicalness in any system is acceptable to you. Would help if you put that in your OP probably.

  • source
  •  

    Another post reminded me of this movie trilogy and my gripe with how people at best draw the "the world is a simulation" idea from it. The directors have been clear about the influences of eastern philosophy. Which only gets more personal for them with the subtext of also exploring the experience of being transgender, and how genders are just social agreements with no inherent, fixed reality.

    There are pretty pretty heavy hints in the movie (including the last one having an Upanishadic mantra in the soundtrack:

    Asato mā sad gamaya (from the unreal, lead me to the real)

    Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya (from darkness, lead me to the light)

    Mṛtyor mā’mṛtaṃ gamaya (from death, lead me to immortality)

    Unpacked here (a bit, but it’ll correct the likely, immediate misconceptions people unfamiliar with eastern philosophy would get)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoEcSc064YY

    The irony is that despite its philosophical depth, The Matrix became shorthand for "what if life is a video game," which to me seems like a convenient escape from the harder questions around how we perform reality, how we cling to narratives as if they’re absolute. The Wachowskis didn’t just reference Eastern thought. They used it to ask, what can you actually truly know to be REAL?

    Just wanted soapbox for a bit because I don't wanna lecture in the other thread...

    (oh and let's not even get into how incredibly badly the "Red Pill" symbolism got corrupted to be the polar fucking opposite of what it was in the movie...)

    [–] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    It’s a great connection. Beyond Descartes, the Wachowskis explicitly cited Buddhist philosophy as a primary influence, specifically the concepts of Maya (illusion) and Samsara (the cycle of suffering which people unfortunately tend to misunderstand a lot).

    The "There is no spoon" scene is a direct nod to Sunyata, or emptiness. It suggests that "reality" isn’t just subjective; it lacks inherent existence. In this view, it’s not just the world that is a construct, but the "self" perceiving it as well. Lana Wachowski has also stated that the trilogy was designed as a "meditation" on the nature of choice and the self, influenced by their interest in Eastern philosophy.

    There's also an Upanishadic mantra in the third movie soundtrack, appropriately:

    Asato mā sad gamaya (from the unreal, lead me to the real)

    Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya (from darkness, lead me to the light)

    Mṛtyor mā'mṛtaṃ gamaya (from death, lead me to immortality)

    Unpacked here (a bit, but it'll correct the likely, immediate misconceptions people unfamiliar with eastern philosophy would get)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoEcSc064YY

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 46 points 7 months ago*

    Okay? No. Normal? In the context of that person's life, yes it's normal, else they wouldn't do it.

    Being hurt by perceived rejection is normal and valid. Making another person "wrong" for holding a boundary for whatever reason is not valid, though it might be understandable which is NOT the same as excusable.

    People need to learn more non-violent communication, and general understanding of boundaries.

  • source
  •  

    I can kinda see it happening on mainstream internet, on YouTube etc. with witless non-nerds but I'm surprised to see it in places that inherently require one to be a tiny bit internet savvy, like Lemmy. I get that getting a bot spam the same message isn't exactly resource intensive but i still wonder if the cost-effort-return ratio is worth it.

    view more: next ›