[–] [S] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That could be, but I don't think that it should be relied upon. The shortener itself can execute malicious code, so that kind of security is, in my opinion, essentially theatre. I'd just say that don't click on links that you don't trust.

This project is for own use/use with friends/family/internally in an org etc., where trust isn't an issue. Of course, I cannot stop anyone from using it in any other way that they see fit. It can help shorten annoying long links for ease of sharing, but that's it.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I decided to migrate to zpack.nvim instead. Got to keep my old lazy config with minimal changes, and it works pretty great. I guess I just like the modular nature of my setup, and also I just went through a major rewrite last month, don't wanna redo it just yet.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I've been thinking about moving away from nvim-treesitter for this. There seem to be some alternatives already, like tree-sitter-manager. Or I can probably just get it to work without any plugins.

    The only thing that I'm worried about are the features provided by nvim-treesitter-textobjects. Has anyone been able to replicate those in native neovim, or even using some other plugin that's not dependent on nvim-treesitter?

    Edit: There seems to be some interesting recent development.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Just to add to it, there's a thin wrapper around it called zpack that's basically a drop-in replacement for lazy.

    I'm not the dev, but I've migrated from lazy to it without much of a hassle, and the performance seems to be on par. I did encounter a bug, but the dev was quick to fix it. Just wanted to give them a shout-out.

  • source
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›