Some people prefer to have a game mod manager working immediately, others prefer their system working for years instead of failing to boot after an update.
I think the constant brain rot from the cradle will have a much worse effect in that regard. In my uneducated opinion, LLMs are scary due to cultivating delusions of every kind.
LLMs are going to make the world stupid, I guarantee it.
Waaaaaaay too late for that...
Literally the first sentence
screw using someone's personal distro
And all 3 are anonymous...
Hahahaha it really does.
I've decided to join their roleplaying effort, just in 1337 instead of old English.
No, dd doesn't.
I know, I'm just pointing out some of the "hidden magic".
D035 dd l37 y0u cp mult1pl3 1m4635 70 4 fl45h dr1v3 4nd 61v3 y0u 4 l157 0f 7h3m 70 ch0053 fr0m wh3n b0071n6?
That's the whole point of stable distros, but people can't distinguish "stable" from "reliable" so we get comments like "arch is really stable".
or are there better ways to learn art?
Nothing is better than classes where someone will give you personalised advice, corrections, and assignments. IMO books are a supplementary resource.
Definitely not cheap though, and definitely not required if you want to do it as a hobby.
Plasma has a cycle of releasing a bunch of new features and changes, and then squashing bugs every week when they discover them.
Debian is on a 2+ year release schedule, and the packages are frozen long before the release. So plasma might be either working fine, or be broken for 2+ years.
Fedora is semi-stable because it's on a 4 month schedule, and AFAIK they don't rush upgrading to new major plasma versions, so plasma works a lot better.
Generally from my experience, plasma works best on rolling distros, while it's crap on stable ones. Stable DEs like xfce are incomparably better suited to stable distros.
view more:
next ›