[–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

That's true, but sitting in a warehouse is costing someone money and I'm sure they were more than happy to sell the books even if they knew they'd eventually get destroyed.

Sure, thats a possibility, I wasnt arguing otherwise.

But the other thing is, what should these companies do instead? They scraped the internet and got skewered for that. They pirated books and got in trouble for that. Now they are legally purchasing books to scan.

For me, them doing sketchy and illegal shit, mostly getting away with it and then charging you for access to said ill-gotten gains is a valid reason for people to be upset at them, rage inducing, even.

That aside the equivalent of mass book burning isn't a good look regardless of legality, even less so when its the same people that did the sketchy shit before.

There is no benefit of the doubt left.

I can see how someone could get to:

"all they do is sketchy shit so even though this might look legit, let's vocally show our disdain for them and anything they are doing"

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    It's one of those lore things, like the SCP Foundation or any folk tales, this one just happened to come from 4chan.

    The idea of liminal spaces being creepy or unnerving isn't new, the cumulative lore around an example of that is where you get this particular story.

    The SCP Foundation is another good example of this.

    Is it full nerd to read through fictional files on pretend beings, sure.

    Is it enjoyable, also yes, for a particular subset of people.

    The reason I think this is a good example is because this particular aggregate folk tale is bleeding into other projects.

    The game Control has strong SCP vibes, as does abiotic factor.

    You've also got niche stories like "There is no antimemetics division"

    Here is a short (15 min) film covering the opening of that book

    Spoilers obviously

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    The "small steps" comment was me.

    The shift described in the overton window is the shift in the perception of normal.

    If 5 steps down are taken, then the window shifts, followed by another 5 downward steps, you're still down 10 steps from where you started.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    You would know better than I, I suppose.

    Have you considered that it might just be the only overlapping space between you two?

    Perhaps if there were more surface area overlap you'd be able to disagree over a wider range of subjects.

    Meh, not my business either way.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›