[–] 3 points 1 month ago

Did they go back on the CLA? I'd more readily point out their proprietary software on their gitlab, and their general lack of commitment to FOSS. They made a newly fully proprietary gif service and whatnot, which is just weird for an org promoting FOSS.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    They used AI for macros, and refuse to remove the AI code, plus I'm not convinced it'll reach MVP.

    image

    image

    They have evolved more and more twards not removing the AI code, which is frustrating, I had been watching with hope for like 1.5 years, but after they added the AI code, and refused to remove it for so long, I've kinda lost any hope.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Yeah, I get the confusion, this is part of why we're thinking about making fermi the primary name due to it having much better SEO and whatnot. We're very anti-AI and have been working on removing any dependencies that we can from Harmony that use AI. been a lot of work getting everything into shape, though it's worth it as I'm not really aware of anything else that's as complete as we are, anti-AI and fully FOSS. Though I've heard of another project that's fairly early on recently, and will be interested to keep an eye on that

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    While I'm maintaining Harmony, I'm going through and trying to purge as many discrepancies as I can, and especially ones that use AI, and it's really just disappointing how many use AI, and this one is by far the most disappointing, it was replaced by a 30 line custom package, and they're all in on the AI slop for some reason. But none the less I'll continue to fight against AI for Harmony to try to make a complete and usable discord alternative!

    view more: next ›