[–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

I thought this was debunked as Tesla pretty much faking the energy consumption numbers. The cars seem to be average in independent real world tests. That's not really surprising as electrical motors are more or less a solved problem for a long time now.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The difference is, that one second is personal cost. The CO2 is socialized cost. If you have a different perspective on this, I understand. When I looked up wireless charging because it looked cool and saw the numbers, I decided to stick with cables and not buy any wireless charging hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    The gain may not be much but the cost is even less. Reaching for a cable costs a second more and would save around 10000 tons of coal per year (based on your calculation) if the equivalent of coal power plants were reduced by the same amount. It's not like using wired charging is any sort of effort that would outweigh the benefit.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›