[–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

Bugger, I wish I knew this option existed before I replaced my 4a with my current 7a. I daily drove it with LineageOS once support ended from GrapheneOS but it was rather buggy and at some points, unstable.

The 7a isn't bad at all, and it's been quite reliable especially with GrapheneOS. But I do severely miss the back fingerprint sensor, the corner camera instead of the centre one and the headphone jack.

Oh well, hopefully by the time this 7a dies (because I will drive this thing into the ground, then replace the battery and go again) the Motorola options will be available and viable. And this 7a would finally become my second phone, probably for work.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I used to with LMDE (client) and Debian (server), but Cinnamon was a little bit too stuttery on the rickety old hardware I have (i5-5200U NUC and i5-5250U MBA), so now the NUC runs CachyOS with Xfce and the MBA runs Win10 LTSC because sometimes Windows is needed for my studies or certain voxel game leaks.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Completely agreed. My TV is some cheap Akai 24" thing, but at least it's a dumb TV with a built-in DVD player, so I still enjoy it. The speakers on it are absolutely garbage, so that's why I bother with a separate speaker. I too live in very small housing and frequently move about, so having any kind of speaker system is just not feasible.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    For me, it's a social activity where I can enjoy with close friends. I also don't have a 4K TV or surround sound system, so the audio and visual quality is miles ahead in the theatre than my 1080p TN LCD flatscreen and Bluetooth speaker.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago

    I'm completely with you and I daily drive Linux. It's not just Lemmy, there is a vocal majority I've anecdotally seen that have this thing to push Linux onto everyone.

    I used to be the same, until a friend I was pestering outright told me that it was ruining our friendship and Linux does not fit his needs, and it's not something he's open to.

    Ever since, I've taken the approach of just never bringing it up and while I'll happily answer questions, I accept people still need Windows and aren't ready for such a sudden switch, because contrary to what that vocal majority says, it is a completely different environment for normies and takes a lot of mental energy and adjustment to get used to an entirely different system, even if the interface is near identical.

    Side note: having this vocal majority seems to be a thing I've also seen in other vegans, surely there's a term coined for this phenomenon because it's certainly not limited to Linux users.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'll second that even in Sequoia now you mention it.

    If I'm in a full screen application and I Exposé, the main desktop apps are in view despite the full screen application being highlighted. Swiping left or right between desktops updates something that corrects this, but definitely doesn't feel like intended behavior.

    I have dock magnification on and in certain situations, the cursor will leave the dock but the magnification effect remains where it last saw the cursor.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I haven't kept up with the latest minor updates to Tahoe, but I've been staying back on Sequoia because while Tahoe looks very pretty and I'm glad to finally see a potential end to Material design, the readability issues with Tahoe are legitimate and rolling back to Sequoia has been a breath of fresh air.

    I jumped over to the Mac world from Linux only this year (although I still keep my X260 with LMDE around) but perhaps it was the worst time to do so - I'll see how I feel once Sequoia support ends and whether Asahi Linux would be more viable.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Seconded on their usefulness on the road. Incredibly easy to just reach over, hold the PTT button and get your message across. One time purchase for something that won't get shut down or unsupported ever.

    If you try communicating with a phone, the only safe way to do it (assuming one person per vehicle) is to start a phone call before leaving, and keep it running constantly. If you have a passenger, they become your secretary. If the call drops then that's all comms lost until both pull over and redial. Requires mobile coverage everywhere on your route which in Australia isn't the case, even on major routes like A1 Bruce Highway.

    Walkie talkies are king for travelling with mates

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think my initial shock was that he's my supervisor and couldn't even identify that it was a standard outside of the Galaxy S5, so it brings any IT knowledge of his into question.

    That being said, he was pretty open about us technicians knowing more about the nitty gritty computing than he did, so his lack of IT knowledge wasn't a major issue as he was a decent team leader, which I found more important to his position.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    I had a boss who called that connector the "Samsung plug" when I had an external HDD and was trying to find a cable for it. I had an S5 for years, so I knew exactly what he was talking about, not that it quelled my shock given he was the team lead of IT support.

    Needless to say he was (and still probably is) a huge Samsung guy

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Hello, not sure if this is the right community but it's the closest I could find on Aussie.zone

    I've been enjoying roadtripping in my Forester, but I'm contemplating whether I'd prefer to have a dedicated camper instead. I live at a place with only one parking spot for me, ruling out any caravans or camper trailers.

    My main requirements would be compact (only as big as I need), sleeps 2 (ideally separately, even if it's a mattress on a table so mates aren't uncomfortable) and comfortable even in cold southern winters (down to 0°C). Niceties would be amenities like table and seats inside, small fridge, onboard water, cool if it had a shower.

    So far, I've been thinking a ute with a slide on camper - my only real question is the solutions that have a pop top with canvas, would those be a pain in the ass to maintain and keep from ripping or degrading, and would they still insulate well?

    Otherwise while I don't have much experience woodworking, I'd be open to converting a small van to a camper (there's a men's shed right next door to me that would help me out). I'd be open to converting the 2004 Forester, ripping out the rear seats, but I think I'd only have room for two narrow single beds in it.

    My main motivation for this would be to have as an alternative to hotel rooms when I just want to travel a long distance and need somewhere to sleep, and I'd probably plan to travel for about 4-6 weeks a year average, plus the odd weekend camp here and there.

    I've otherwise thought about a roof top tent with all the amenities like stove, prep bench, fridge etc. in the car but my concerns would be storing it out of the weather (wouldn't have enough room in my little room I'm renting) and insulation in cold temperatures. If those problems could be mitigated, I imagine this could be a cost effective option.

    With all that, is there anything that I'm not thinking of as requirements or constraints, and other cheap options for what I'd like to do?

    view more: next ›