[–] 2 points 2 weeks ago*

There are very few games that are exclusive to the PS3 now that unofficial PC ports are a thing. Games like God of War III, the Uncharted trilogy, their PS4 versions can all be played directly on PC. So I suggest you check out if the game is available on PS4 before you deal with rpcs3. Even if it doesn't have a port, it might be better to play the PS4 version on shadPS4 than playing it on rpcs3.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I've seen other comparisons that found little difference between RUNE cracked version and the official Ubisoft version with Denuvo.

    This comparison is between RUNE and voices38, so the only thing you can infer from this is that voices38 crack is worse than the Ubisoft version.

  • source
  •  

    That post about the Office 2019 license expiring on Mac (https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/70667106) made me think how many of us might not understand how people outside the pirate bubble deal with situations like that. My understanding is that the post's author completely misses the point regarding what's happening here. Those who bought an Office license back in 2019 are very much likely to have upgraded their packages already, so they won't even know about this expiration date. The very few who are still using their old Office version will react at that as if it were a notification, buy a new one and won't bother about it at all.

    My point is that their relationship with paying for software is very different from how a pirate sees it; paying for a new version of an application every couple of years is not a problem for them. It's like gamers who buy Call of Duty or EA Sports titles every year. It doesn't make them idiots, it's just a different way of dealing with money and that service. They like the new shiny stuff and they can pay for it, so I totally understand their choice of buying it.

    This reminds me of that Stop Killing Games initiative and some thought I had about it, and also many posts I see of people complaining about the end of physical media. All publishers publish their content following the trends and the technology available at that specific time, always trying to maximize their profits. It was always like that and always will be. If they used in the past physical media it was only because online storefronts did not exist, or we wouldn't even have had discs or tapes or cartridges to miss.

    To understand my point you have to think back about the origin of movie theaters. Movies were released exclusively on theaters and that's the only place people could watch them. Once they went out of theaters, that was it. The movie was gone and people couldn't watch it anymore. Nobody complained about it, that's how things worked. Now imagine movies were invented now, how would studios release them? Actually, you don't need to imagine it. YouTube and TikTok are here to show how people deal with video on 2026. They consume it online and never bother about owning it or keeping it.

    Another example is live sports. You never see people complaining they can't buy sports seasons on Bluray or download them. We have a culture of watching sports events almost exclusively live (with very few exceptions). If you don't watch it live, you missed it. People are used about this and don't complain.

    So although I understand those defending the right to keep their media, the publishers have the right to release it however they want. We only see it as a problem because we were used with the way things were, if that way hadn't existed, we wouldn't even think about it.

    [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Is a rent-based economic system something new?

    I used to rent VHS tapes and DVDs to watch movies for years. I never bought a VHS or a DVD in my life, and I watched hundreds of movies in those formats. Same thing for SNES games. Most of them I played after renting their cartridges for a weekend.

    The only difference now is that the publishers are renting their products directly to us and making this their main source of income, making owning the products harder (or just plain impossible). But most third-world boys like me are used to this. I would never own official stuff anyway but I still have been consuming their content for decades.

  • source
  •  

    I think I understood overall how this DeNuvo bypass works, but one thing I'm not sure about yet is the following. If I disable the security layers, play the game, then enable again those security layers, would I be as secure as I was before? Or some hidden malware might have taken the opportunity to permanently infect my PC beyond recovery?

    Sports Piracy in 3D (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
     

    Has anyone here checked the 3D live in the usopen.org page? https://www.usopen.org/en_US/scores/

    I must say I was impressed. It is not perfect, but if what you to want to watch is just the sport being played, it might very well meet your needs. Add a little sound to it and I could watch a whole tennis match that way.

    That made me think how one could convert any sports event to 3D and stream it. I don't know how many cameras IBM uses for that 3D stream, but a handful of volunteers recording the game with their phones and uploading it to a server that would process it could, in theory, generate a 3D version of the match. Maybe even the cameras of the official stream itself could be enough to create this.

    The best part of this is that the 3D stream would be untraceable. It can't be watermarked, it's just the movement of the players and the ball, nothing else. And it also would have a ridiculously low bit rate. You could watch a match in 4K using a 100 kbps stream. You could even customize the assets to remove ads and make the players wear the uniform of your choice.

    I'm probably dreaming too much, but a man can dream, right?