Based on the article, the man doesn't sound like a psychopath. Seems to lack the superficial charm of one and have genuine fondness for his wife.

I looked into CCRC mentioned here and seems like they only refer cases where new evidence has been found. Rejecting old evidence does not qualify. The committee has also been severely hit by austerity measures in recent years.

Couldn't say whether he's guilty or not, but based on the coverage here and the incompetence of the police investigation, the man clearly deserves a retrial.

See, this is the kind of article that makes randomly clicking on Wikipedia articles worthwhile.

To test whether the software accurately reported what its sources said, the researchers broke the overviews down into 98,020 individual factual claims. They built an automated verification pipeline, powered by a separate large language model, that read the text of the cited websites.

Uhh...

Maybe you shouldn't have the hallucination machine verify the output of the hallucination machine?

I wonder how she feels about this private moment being broadcast to the whole world.