Says who, anthropic?
post
It's too dangerous !!! Btw buy our stock, our IPO is coming soon
Pump and dump?
Not much time left, yes.
https://apnews.com/article/tech-stocks-ai-investments-8a0ff4c95d5cae6f65c6e2ba03047058
Completely baseless and stupid claim from an admin that lies more often than not. This would be crazy if true though.
If you think its hacking nearly all NSA systems you're cooked.
Hey look it's a 5 day old AI evangelist account.
You clearly don't understand the technology, which disqualifies you from fear stoking the masses who also dont understand it.
A dipshit LLM isn't gonna kill anyone directly idk what you're on about lol
The terminator is not real
You believe AI can hack systems, that's what i'm basing this on, and your other comments which are all promoting LLMs to be far more than they actually are.
If you mean that LLMs are more powerful brute force attackers, sure, but "Anthropic models hacked" and the OP you wrote yourself is just fearmongering. At best LLMs can tech a person who did not previously know how, how to commit certain crimes, and possibly create bash scripts to automate this, but that is not a model that autonomously hacks.
The hype is purely to drive the coming IPO, they have to go hard and fast before the world realises what rouse is being pulled.
If you just want to critically think for one moment: (leaving asside models have no autonomous agency) If the Mythos-class models really are that impressive, and it did what they claimed, how was it not disabled before Fable went public? Mythos had been 'out' for over a month to those select few orgs.
There's a discussion in the House of Lords last week which is a bunch of grandma's and grandpa's yapping on about the dangers of AI. You remind me of them. Remember how little people understand about the toxic algorithms of social media? They understand about 100x less of this, and are all making kneejerk decisions because they don't understand anything and are scared if something goes wrong, the buck will stop with them.
And Anthropic and Open AI both benefit from not educating people too much, because that would pop the Myth and the Fable they are trying to sell.
I have an above average understanding of the underlying technology, and there is no more threat today from "AI" than there has been from other sophisticated tools circulating on the dark web for decades.
To use an analogy: I understand how a combustion engine works. If you suddenly came out and claimed that combustion engines are able to mow grass and we would never have to mow lawns ourselves gain, I would understand enough to know you're out of your depth.
You can believe pigs can fly, but to people who understand pigs, they will just see you're talking about beliefs, because the knowledge and the science says, that simply because of their lack of wings and fairly dense bodies, the rotation of their tiny curly tails is simply insufficient to provide the lift to make them airborne.
What you can do is put lipstick on said pig, and that is what I'll let you do now, just expect to run into resistance when you talk to people who know instead of believe.
No I didn't claim that. I'm saying that whatever they have that you believe and are speculating is dangerous, isn't LLM based, because that tech is incapable of from its technological foundation to achieve what you're trying to fear monger.
You really bought into their advertising huh?
Hey buddy... How does AI work? Just, briefly explain how it works so we can verify that you know what you're talking about.
Oh, no, I know how these things work generally, but do you? I'll let you decide if you wanna pick LLMs or Generative AI or Machine Learning. How does any AI "learn"? How does it do anything? How would any of these AI systems hack anything. Just... Walk us all through it. Because if you don't know how these things work or would work, then I'm not gonna trust your assertions.
I mean... There are a lot of reasons to be skeptical of mythos, but taking this situation in a vacuum, the hack against the NSA was done by a team at the NSA, for pen testing purposes. Why would that lead to them releasing anything?
Fable/Mythos was already shown to not be that much better at vulnerability finding than previous models. If anything this is basically saying that security at the NSA really isn't up to par.
All I see is market manipulation. I'd be happy to be proven wrong when it's released worldwide
top 41 comments