By the time Maria Ruhtenberg was fired from her job last September for posting about Charlie Kirk's assassination, few people even knew what she had written.

The posts and comments she had made on Facebook were only visible to her friends. Just one person, a Facebook friend she barely knew, complained to her employer. "I don't even know how we became Facebook friends, honestly," said Ruhtenberg.

Ruhtenberg then sued the state and Wright in federal court for First Amendment retaliation. In May, they settled and Ruhtenberg was awarded $125,000 in damages.

The Iowa public defender's office and Wright did not respond to a request for comment.

Nine months after Kirk's assassination, cases like Ruhtenberg's continue to be resolved in favor of people who suffered consequences for their social media activity about Kirk. While many of these plaintiffs have settled with six-figure payouts, they are still grappling, to different degrees, with the aftermath of their firings.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

Settlements for these organizations are often cheaper than litigation and enable them to get out of it with impunity while admitting no fault.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 5 comments in c/politics@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 16 points 4 months ago

    A woman at my workplace was fired for it, she's now suing the living shit out of the employer and the individuals who made the decisions on an individual basis.

    She's a lawyer so, not well thought out.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Israel killed kirk.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Reading about the payout some guy got from a corrupt sheriff who locked him up made me realize I should have jumped on this bandwagon to make a few bucks. Fuck Chuck. His wife blows Vance.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    To be fair to past you, it was not at all clear that our legal system was going to actually follow the law in this case. Nor is it easy to sue someone about anything. Plus, who knows? I assume these judgements aren't immune to appeals, anything could still happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I assume this only applies because she was an employee of a government.

  • source