all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Huge disappointment when he transformed into just some schmuck.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Hollywood literally cannot tell a "looks don't matter" story without sneaking the looks (or status) back in by the third act. The Beast turning into a generic prince. She's All That spends ninety minutes insisting personality matters, then resolves it with a makeover. The Princess Diaries goes one further: "you're fine as you are" turns out to mean "you're fine as you are, also you're secretly a princess."

    I don't think the people writing these endings believe the lesson themselves. An industry that runs on headshots and red carpets isn't positioned to sell "looks don't matter" with a straight face, and that disbelief leaks into the third act. Shallow people writing a story about looking past shallowness was always going to end with someone getting hot again. What bugs me is that they sell this corrupted message to our kids, repeating the cycle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Yeah he should’ve been turned into a middle aged balding guy with a potbelly. The original story was basically an allegory about arranged marriage. It was written for young girls who would be wedded to an older man. To teach girls that their old future husband might look like an ugly monsters but they might possess a good heart.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    At least Shrek bucked the trend

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Well, the story of the ugly duckling is significantly older than Hollywood. The "looks don't matter" archetype has always been "it's okay if you look ugly now so long as you become beautiful in the end."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Yep. While they had top character designs for the mains, the "transformed prince" looks like a design afterthought, done by the studio apprentice. Not just second tier character, more like a sketchup in a hurry.

    I almost expected Belle to say "That's it? Can I have my beast back, it looked better!"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It's kinda lucky that she was also into humans, and not exclusively furry.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    Isn't that kinda the whole point of the story?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    I refute this Belle had seen the picture of the prince earlier

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Today: minimum 6'2". Shorter guys pls swipe left.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    I saw this in theaters as a little girl, it’s actually the first movie I saw at theaters. Even as a kid who hadn’t even hit puberty yet I was so disappointed by his human form lol, he’s cuter as the beast! I know most of my friends at the time also found prince Adam to be unattractive

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    As one billion fangirls (and some bois) have pointed out: he was more fuckable as a beast.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/shit@piefed.world view that post
    [–] 1 point 4 months ago