I think he outlasted that head of lettuce
post
So, this other guy wins a special election and now he's gonna be the next PM? How does that work?
Boo no fun. I wanted to see him get dragged out of downog street kicking and screaming.
This article is weird - the headline reads as if it's a done deal, but the content reads that we're in the same situation: Burnham's side pressuring Starmer to step down, Starmer's side denying he's going to do so. So the news is actually just Burnham's side want Starmer to step down.
I generally like the Guardian, but the coverage over the Makerfield by-election and Burnham's aspirations have felt quite biased. They had 10 articles on the Makerfield by-election itself on Friday, and a lot of the themes seemed to be pushing an inevitability narrative of Burnham being leader.
The Guardian is usually better at separating editorialising from news, so I've been a bit disappointed in the coverage. I'm actually leaning in favour of Burnham but it feels like the Guardian focusing on an inevitability narrative is like it's trying to help shape the story rather than just report it. It's a left wing paper but it's not a good sign that it's blurring the lines between editorial and news.
It could be the Guardian manufacturing consent for Burnham. Or, they could be talking with Labour MPs off the record. Sure, Starmer hasn't announced anything, but anyone who know, KNOWS.
I don't really know where I land on The Guardian, they're mostly factual so probably the latter. Do they have a wealthy owner, for whom Burnham is particularly advantagous, to justify manufacturing the consent?
He announced his resignation, it was probably the latter
Brits, what’s the read on his presumed replacement? I figure he can’t be more of a disappointment than Starmer has been but I’m still curious.
It's likely to be Andy Burnham, who IIRC is currently the only British politician with a net positive approval rating. So that's something. 🤷♂️ He's been pretty successful (and well liked) as the mayor of Greater Manchester, and generally comes across a bit more human than the other lizard-people in British politics.
He's often described as "soft-left" by the media. So far, he's been a vocal supporter of proportional representation, which is great, but whether he'll drop that as soon as he gets into Number 10 is a different matter.
He's a member of the "Labour Friends of Israel" group, but kinda seems to mostly sit on the fence on that whole issue. (He called for a ceasefire but refused to call it a genocide.)
I'm sure other people will chip in with other problematic things about him, I haven't looked too deeply. 😃
Thanks, sounds like a marginal improvement but I suppose we’ll see about that
This is a good summary.
I think whats missing is a lot of the hope being put into Burnham is by disillusioned Labour MPs, and may not reflect actual change.
Burnham is personally popular, but being Mayor of Manchester is generally an uncontroversial role: he can't raise taxes and he has limited power, but he can be noisey complaining about how the Westminster Government mistreats the north and also claim a share in the success for projects like the integrated transport system. Things people don't like in Manchester he can blame on Westminster.
While Burnham is a good communicator, he can't actually change the fundamentals for Labour in government: there is no spare money even after tax rises, the economy is growing slowly (or shrinking slowly factoring in inflation) which both severely limits what can be done. Many Labour MPs fear they will lose their seats in the next election, and can't see how to change things.
Burnham may be better at communicating how bad things are but I think realistically he will also become very unpopular, as the problem isn't the prime minister as much as the reality. "Manchesterism" as a political philosophy is fools gold.
I'd also add: Burnham chose not to stand in the last general election when he would have been a shoe-in as an MP. He has instead had to gamble now to become an MP as he's seen an opportunity to become PM. While is gamble paid off, I'm not sure that shows very good political judgement, and may be a warning about what's to come.
I think the only way the UK has of getting it of the mess they're in is to ditch their idiotic election system. They had the Tories in power for most of the last four decades and they've absolutely fucked up the place, while never actually having a majority of the vote. Burnham at least said he wants to do electoral reform so let's hope he comes through.
With the turnover of British MPs, it sometimes take me a bit to learn the new names. "Starmer" took longer for me to learn because whenever I'd read British news, it always looked like a bit of slang for a derisive word instead of a proper noun. When I finally figured out it was the new PM, I thought the word Starmer as a derisive slang was entirely appropriate.
Starmer is a pedophile
top 29 comments