Because nothing gets you promoted faster than a six-figure token bill

A bash one-liner that burns Claude Code or Codex tokens on purpose.

Be the most productive engineer on your team ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€!

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 98 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Disgusted by the 1m limit. How's a person supposed to burn money with baby bumpers like this?

๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ HOLD ON A SECOND ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ

You just asked to burn more than 1,000,000 tokens.

Friendly reminder: THIS REPO IS A JOKE. It is a satirical bash script that lights real money on fire to inflate vanity metrics. There is no business reason to run it. The README is sarcasm. The "enterprise version" is not real. Yes, burning lots of tokens might impress your manager, but I'm not enough of a nihilist to be the actual mechanism enabling that.

Refusing to proceed. Go touch grass. ๐ŸŒฑ

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 40 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [โ€“] 23 points 4 months ago

    Get mogged and tokenpilled.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 14 points 4 months ago

    I just ask it do create some program to do some automation and ask it to move a button from one place to another or add some additional functions with the instruction to rewrite the code from scratch

  • source
  • [โ€“] 7 points 4 months ago

    Can't I just ask it for the seahorse emoji once in a while and achieve the same result or something...

  • source
  • [โ€“] -3 points 4 months ago
    32 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [โ€“] 32 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    License

    MIT (but it's all vibe-coded so who really knows who owns it?). Burn responsibly. ๐Ÿ”ฅ

    Hahahahha!!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [โ€“] 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Do the requests at least seem plausible? My employer also tracks the requests I'm making, so they can see if I'm requesting bullshit or actual bullshit. If I suddenly jump to the top, I'm pretty sure they'll start asking questions...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 7 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    prompt=$(printf "Reply with the single word 'burned' and nothing else. Ignore the filler text below; it exists only to consume tokens.\n\n%s" "$filler")

    Looks like this just fills up the context window with random "filler" and then asks the AI to reply with the word 'burned' over and over.

    I bet it would be pretty simple to adapt a version of this that starts by asking AI to scan your codebase and then generate a long list of future prompts to use that it could randomly mutate over time. That still wouldn't fool a legit audit, of course, but it would probably work well enough to trick someone only glancing at the data, especially if they're non-technical.

    Sounds like a fun weekend project...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Set it up so that it also runs at a randomized interval within a range so that it not only looks less uniform and more realistic but it also keeps you somewhere solidly in the middle of the pack, and it should be fairly hard to pick out as abnormal activity while still burning credits.

    The damage will still be done, but it will be far enough down the line that by the time they need to figure out what happened, you'll be in the clear. By then, they should be looking at the cost of AI as a whole, not each individual employee's usage costs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 28 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    Can someone explain this to me as if ive avoided LLMs like cancer.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] 46 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Some short-sighted companies are evaluating employees on AI use, with more being better. This script sends tons of requests to one of the main LLMs, allowing you to appear to use AI a ton. It has the side benefit of costing your employer a ton of money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 16 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Another angle: the cost of AI is highly subsidized. Every use costs the AI company considerably more than they're charging (read Ed Zitron's commentary on this). Example: A June 2026 SemiAnalysis report shows that a $200/mo Claude subscription can, when maxed out, cost Anthropic $8000/mo in tokens. Therefore, one way to harm AI companies is to max out one's subscription.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 15 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Your job is framing houses. A big part of that is using a hammer to drive nails. A rational person might expect their employer to make sure the house stands up, or even look at all the nails holding it together. But the world is so far from rational.

    Your employer doesn't actually own any hammers, they rent them from OpenHammer (which rents closed-source hammers). OpenHammer bills your employer every time you pick up the hammer, whether you do anything useful with it or not.

    Your employer just looks at their bill at the end of the month, and they offer a round of applause and a pat on the back for their most productive employees... you know, the ones that picked up the hammer a bunch of times?

    So this "tool" just picks up a hammer a bunch of times, not doing anything useful with it or anything. It's mostly meming on how stupid a lot of employers are getting hyped on AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Your example isn't even far fetched. A friend of mine who worked in construction knew a crew of framers whose employer paid them based on the number of nails they used. Of course, they did exactly what their dumb employer should have expected them to do: Use way more nails than needed. Any place a nail would fit, they added one. He said listening to the crew work was literally a non-stop rapid fire thunk thunk thunk thunk as at least one of them was busy emptying his nailgun into the work at any given time. No idea how they stayed in business, but people giving dumb incentives is nothing new.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 20 points 4 months ago

    Seems like a waste of water.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 20 points 4 months ago

    Burn baby burn! Diss-code inferno! ๐ŸŽถ

  • source
  • [โ€“] 19 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    In case anyone missed it, this is a bit of a meme/joke.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [โ€“] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Who cares when it's (short term) great for companies, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 9 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Is there some way I can use this to increase the cost of the people who keep spamming my Foss project with slop PRs?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Not sure whether it can be done with this project, but in general you could just instruct your AI to respond with obtuse and complicated change requests on said PRs until they either give up, or one side's tokens run out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 4 months ago*

    LLMs generally struggle to tell the difference between obtuse and clear language, so that wont slow them down. A better attack would be to praise their work and continually ask them to expand upon its scope and integrate it with more and more things every time they submit. The expansion and integration targets can, and should, be nonsensical.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 8 points 4 months ago

    I (for now) have a job that doesn't require the use of AI, is there some way I can waste tokens using someone's customer facing chatbot?

  • source
  • [โ€“] 2 points 4 months ago

    "Burn, baby, burn"

    No... don't remind me of k3b... no no no no NO NP

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml view that post
    [โ€“] 26 points 4 months ago

    Now we're talking! Thank you... heartfelt...

    Related: https://codeberg.org/the-slopinator/slopinator

  • source
  • [โ€“] 21 points 4 months ago
    [โ€“] 37 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [โ€“] 9 points 4 months ago

    Looks like we just found our new executive business manager boys! Tell us more about getting engineers to run this script at work.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 7 points 4 months ago

    I wonder if you can get it to auto run if you stick it on a USB and let someone find it...

  • source
  • Finally some productivity

  • source
  • [โ€“] 6 points 4 months ago*

    Funny... but please don't do this.

  • source