all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 4 months ago

Mighty generous of the EU

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    Sold.

    When do we sign up?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Don't do that to me. Don't give me hope.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Prime Minister Burnham has already ruled this out. Time to vote him out and elect a PM with the balls to rejoin.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Whatever gets the dirty deed undone, though I don't necessarily feel it is a just outcome.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 25 points 4 months ago

    This mf lasted 3 months before being voted out at Matignon, the shortest time for any prime minister in 5th republic France, he's become completely irrelevant and his opinion doesn't mean shit.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    Nope, the UK ain’t getting special founder treatment after they pulled out of the project instead of believing in it.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Do you want the Brits believing that they’re above consequences because everyone recognises their inherent superiority and defers to them? Because that’s how you get it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    Nobody in Britain would mistake this as consequence free if we rejoined. The pro-brexit crowd would be spitting fire and the remainers would be bemoaning the lost decade. Who do you think would be in this hypothetical smugly oblivious state of superiority at that point?

    Not that I think there’s a chance in hell of us rejoining on original terms, but if we somehow did it’d be more like a shellshocked and half dead soldier falling back into the trench, hardly “consequence free”.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    More seriously, if you want to put new conditions in, I’d focus on forcing the uk gov to invest in bringing awareness of and encouraging engagement with eu institutions, that was the real downfall here I think, nobody paid attention to how it all actually worked, so the shit rags could claim whatever they wanted and there was insufficient real experience amongst the public to counter it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    If (or when) Britain rejoins, it will not be like voting for a new government for a change, but out of having exhausted all options and realising that the alternative is far grimmer, that outside of the EU, it would be a hollowed-out plaything of Trumpist oligarchs/Middle Eastern petrostates/the CCP/the neo-Putinist klept. As such, they would be willing to concede on Schengen and the Euro. As such, the EU preemptively folding on those and letting les rosbifs keep their much-cherished pound and Eurostar security queues would be a tremendous own goal.

    Surely keeping the iconic 568ml pint and driving on the left should be enough British exceptionalism to point out that the UK isn’t being homogenised into a suburb of Belgium or whatever the gammon are chronically irate about?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Perfectly possible != likely

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Yeah no, they can come back, but it's the full package or nothing.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Of course EU citizens don't get a say in whether we want that. With the direction they're heading, I'm not sure I'd want them back.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    Oh how predictable. After they pulled out and see the consequences of their actions, namely the downwards spiral of the economy and subsequent decline of life quality they‘re selling a EU membership as a golden goose. Sorry, pal but that‘s not how it works. The world doesn‘t revolve around you.

  • source