all 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

Is it literally electricity? Seems like the mutants with electric powers would be the most realistic, then.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Is it literally electricity?

    No, it's not. It's cascades of ion potentials. That's why it's slow and touch-sensitive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    how is ionic potential not electricity? what is it if not that? I thought ion potential was just how electrically charged the thing is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Initial state: all potential pumped up.

    Signal flow state: first pump releaes, changing potential, which triggers the next pump to release.

    You can think of this like a series of condenser plus transistor discharging one after another.

    While usual electricity is just one potential-difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Don’t these guys have potato with electricity inside?

  • source
  • [+] 33 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
    [–] 61 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    You are essentially a blob of fat, salt, and nerve endings piloting a bone mech with meat armour.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yeah it sounds cool but I use the mech to update spreadsheets

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    The meat is not just armor though - a skeleton alone has no capability to move itself, the meat provides the translation between thought and action, while the skeleton is merely a framework upon which the meat rests.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Yes, but all of these are bound by fundamental physical laws. Cause and effect. You are a deterministic machine.

    You are a meat mech that operates on congruent biological principles. Therefore, everything you do is de facto "logical".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Reality is not concerned with "logic"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I've yet to see evidence to this effect

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    What the hell was the original context for this painting? 😆

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    It's an illuminated manuscript depicting Saint Denis and Saint Piatus, said to have been decapitated for their beliefs.

    Statue of St Denis

    Edit: comes from this book: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Livre_d%27images_de_madame_Marie

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have a theory that initially a lot of these works were made for a laugh, like an old timey joke picture, and over time people kept adding meaning to them.
    Like someone makes a rude and crude painting of a giant cock with eyes, makes people laugh, and a few thousand years later some bloke in a trilby goes "hmm, yes, it seems these people worshipped a penis god at this point in time. Also it clearly reads a prophecy, 'deez nuts'. Fascinating."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    that's Byzantine artwork for ya! here's a post from an art history community that discusses the painting. quite interesting! https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtHistory/comments/e1h0sy/jesus_and_felix_regula_exuperantius_1506/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Wow what a way to depict them! Also, "cephalophoric" sounds like the saints are part octopus 😅

    The cephalophoric saints Felix, Regula and Exuperantius (patron saints of Zurich), holding their attributes, their severed heads, before Christ, 1506, Zürcher Veilchenmeister. (Schweizerisches Nationalmuseum, Zürich)

    The idea behind such a depiction is that those saints were killed when their heads were cut off. So it was decided that they would be honoured to be traditionally presented like that in painting. There are no less than 134 such saints.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Whats kind of weird about this image with priests heads bisected is that the blood is sort of realistic, minus the amount.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Mm electrified head jello :3

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    It’s not meat, it’s pudding.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Consider where that theory came from.

  • source