all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 132 points 5 months ago (5 children)

In the striking memo, the tech giant noted that the ethically-fraught feature should ideally be launched "during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns."

Great article. Per usual, meta is a horrible company filled with horrible people who make the decisions.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago

    Yeah, it is pretty striking, because it hints at something much larger, such as Meta being the cause of political unrest to further it's own agenda. That is striking indeed. They should be fully investigated and dismantled in a fair and just democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    A couple of days ago I finished reading "Careless People" by Sarah Wynn-Williams. This book really shows how awful the people at the top of Facebook are (it probably applies to other similar companies as well). And it's not that they want to be evil, it's more like they are playing a game of fame, pride and power and don't care about the consequences. It made me recall the quote about "the banality of evil".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I'm curious what they mean by "dynamic political environment" and "other concerns".

    Like I get that it's "launch a controversial thing while the people that would care are distracted". But what are we distracted by?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 69 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    One decision we can be clear about—we are not building a central face database.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago

    What we're seeing is the transition to techno feudalism. Capitalism's final insult was to privatize surveillance-state authoritarianism.

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 5 months ago

    we are not building a central face database

    I honestly cannot understand why the parent company of Facebook would actually release such a parody sounding response

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    What is “the Streisand effect”, Alex?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    somewhat sure this won't fly under GDPR

    though that might as weel end up in category "oh we did an oopsie haha! anyway here is our new ML model that can identify anyone! what do you mean? it doesn't store anyone's likeness you sillyy it's a just a little model"

  • source
  • Wow. Just wow.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Man, it's gonna be so funny when the solar storm hits

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment