all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

From the comments of the crosspost on the solarpunk community:

This reads like AI garbage

This is the actual source that the article uses for all its claims: https://bren.ucsb.edu/events/response-endangered-san-joaquin-kit-foxes-solar-farms

Not quite the same conclusions between the two…

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 5 comments in c/biodiversity@mander.xyz view that post
    [–] 29 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The San Joaquin kit fox has been struggling for decades.

    Ah yes, "struggling."

    I.e., polite-speak for "humans have been destroying its habitat, messing with its ability to survive, and making life miserable for it for a long time."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    Yeah, like with pretty much every endangered animal - we either hunted it down or took away their habitat

    That's exactly what the article is about.
    A large coal mine isn't compatible with wildlife, but solar farms, if planned correctly and with the right circumstances, can be.

    And that's a good thing

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    sounds like good news, but holy slop, that shit is unbearable to read

  • source