A handful of anonymous bots have taken over fact-checking on X.

This isn’t hyperbole. In the first three weeks of May, just eight AI contributors wrote 50.3% of all visible Community Notes on the platform.

When the program launched five years ago, X positioned it as a way to harness the knowledge of users to add context and corrections to tweets. It described Community Notes as a way to “broaden the range of voices” fighting misinformation.

Then, in July 2025, X started allowing people to use automation to mass-generate and submit AI notes. That new feature made it inevitable that human writers would eventually be overtaken by bots. But it happened faster than I predicted.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 5 months ago

Dead internet theory

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Citizens of the Earth, we're fucked.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    I forget Twitter exists most of the time

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 23 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    So can they legally be called community notes still?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago

    With the Notes bots fact-checking the Post bots, and AI Scraper bots reading the posts, I think the hard work is done and we can all just never think about Twitter again.

  • source