Parliament will debate the need for an inquiry into Israeli influence on UK politics next month, after more than 116,000 people signed a petition calling for a probe.

The 22 June debate, which will be broadcast on the UK Parliament YouTube channel, comes after the Labour government said it does not support a public inquiry.

The petition raises concerns “about reported Israeli state-linked and pro-Israel lobbying activity in UK politics. We believe it is important to determine the scope and impact of any such influence campaigns.”

It adds: “We feel that the horrific devastation in Gaza, the ongoing suppression of Palestinians in the West Bank, and the UK’s political response underline the urgent need to scrutinise how pro-Israel organisations, networks, and lobbying efforts may shape government decisions, party policy, and public debate.”

In a response on 17 April, the government said: “There is an existing framework for transparency around lobbying of the UK government and Parliament.”

Petition author Andy Kalil told the National that the government’s response was “a whole load of hot air and deflection”, adding that there is an “extreme conflict of interest between pro-Israel lobbying donations and the government’s positions on Gaza, the West Bank, Iran, and southern Lebanon”. 

Current and former members of the Labour cabinet have received over £300k in donations from pro-Israel groups and individuals since 2013, figures compiled by Declassified UK show. Prime minister Keir Starmer received a £50k donation from pro-Israel tycoon Trevor Chinn for his 2020 Labour leadership campaign.

Israel’s genocide in Gaza has killed, at a conservative estimate, more than 73,000 people. The UK government has supported Israel’s military throughout, including by flying surveillance drones above Gaza.

In 2023 Starmer said that Israel had the right to deny water, food and electricity to the besieged enclave’s civilian population. 


From Novara Media via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
6 comments in c/uk_politics@feddit.uk view that post
[–] 15 points 5 months ago

I wonder which side will win that debate... Labour Friends of Israel or Conservative Friends of Israel.

Guaranteed to be a 'we investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong' outcome.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago*

    The debate will likely end up asking why there are 116k anti-semites bold enough to demand this.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    The single most influential individual in UK Politics is actually a foreigner.

    Sir John said he was advised before the election that he “ought to try to make some effort to get closer to the Murdoch press and I agreed that I would write Mr Murdoch to dinner”.

    He added: “In the dinner it became apparent in discussion that Mr Murdoch said that he really didn’t like our European policies… and he wished me to change our European policies.

    “It is not very often someone sits in front of a prime minister and says, ‘I would like you to change your policy and if you do not change your policy our organisation cannot support you’.”

    https://www.channel4.com/news/major-denies-sun-editor-abused-him-after-black-wednesday

    This was the headline of Murdoch's Sun right before the Brexit Referendum :

    (She never said any of this).

    To quote UKIP's leader Nigel Farage:

    "Without Rupert Murdoch, there would have been no Brexit"

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/q01pMCUmQxQ

    This dude is openly threatening the Prime Minister and spreading fake news.

    People are concerned about russian, indian, saudi, chinese influence depending on their politics. Foreign interference is actually happening right under their nose.

    It's just that no one cares because Rupert Murdoch is Australian.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Has anybody ever heard of anything actually happening with these petitions? I am not completely sure but think it gets debated by a specific sub committee rather than what you imagine where its in the full house chamber. The transcripts will be available but in the end the response will be something like: checks and rules are already in place so we don't see any issue (but written out to a few hundred words)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    I think I've signed 2. One was about the Online "Safety" Act, which obviously had nothing happen off the back of it.

    The other was to do with political donations. This one as far as I can tell had a couple of things come from it:

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/707189#main-content

    And even if nothing came from it, it was interesting to follow. It was a couple of years ago now but I think I recall they were talking about Russia's influence with Brexit.

    Sadly the corrupt are just going to find loopholes, like receiving a £5 million personal donation to pay for their security...

  • source
  • parent