How to order a hamburger that's mostly spit
post
Unrealistic. This is way too coherent. Needs more word salad.
This is only missing JP coming up with a completely deranged definition of what fries are that he demands the cashier adheres to (I don't think the vodka applies, that's more making fun of the cashier). And also him entirely dodging the question of whether he likes fries, stating that people have discussed whether he likes fries but he refuses to reveal it.
Obviously fries represent the western civilization. Frying oil is the chaos dragon of woke left that means to destroy the fries, but will instead transform them into something even more beautiful, an entity of culinary perfection. But you would already know that if only you had bought my online course. sob It's so sublime. sob
Employee listening in the background hears the timer for the fries go off. Pulls the basket out from the oil.
Looks at the fries.
Looks at the stand for them to drain.
Looks at Jordan Peterson.
Looks at the fries.
Shoves their own face into the hot oil to escape the sound of JP's voice.
False inductive reasoning combined with butwhataboutism and sealinoning. All designed to exhaust the opponent and muddy the argument. Conservatives love this form of argument.
Sealioning (source) + whataboutism. A very cheap method of trolling and exhausting the opponent of the argument which relies on the victim being unaware of sealioning and they're being sealioned. It's frustrating seeing JP fans think this is proof he's a genius. it's like Ben Shapiro, another rightwing "influencer" who constantly speaks fast and gish gallops on purpose and his fans think he's a genius for that too
Don’t forget the constant motte and bailey.
That, too. For people who don't know what that is (source)
The motte-and-bailey fallacy (named after the motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities: one modest and easy to defend (the "motte") and one much more controversial and harder to defend (the "bailey").[1] The arguer advances the controversial position, but when challenged, insists that only the more modest position is being advanced.[2][3] Upon retreating to the motte, the arguer may claim that the bailey has not been refuted (because the critic refused to attack the motte)[1] or that the critic is unreasonable (by equating an attack on the bailey with an attack on the motte).[4]
"Colloquialism, motherfucker! Do you speak it‽"
Edit: corrected autocorrect incorrection
The "motherfucker" forced me to hear this in Samuel L Jackson's voice.
Dragging your opponent into the weeds does not a good argument make
Sir... this is a Wendy's
McDonalds marketing is getting pretty aggressive if they're sending their cashiers to Wendy's...
The cashier is working undercover in order to steal the krappy patty's secret formula.
Gets plain fries, but gets charged for vodka. Cashier points to vodka line on the bill and says "potatoes", then points to fries and says "potatoes".
My dog is an intellectual powerhouse compared to Jordan Peterson fans.
Lol. I just Googled him and his YouTube channel description reads...
"Join intellectual phenomenon Dr. Jordan B. Peterson for enlightening discourse"
It's a phenomenon how much he lacks any intellectual capabilities.
He is a racist and a bigot
So.... A good candidate for the next US president?
Watching him debate those atheists was painful. His debating technique is beyond stupid.
- Make a statement that is at best wildly controversial and at worst blatantly untrue
- Redefine the words in that statement to make it vacuously true and completely uninteresting
- When challenged, say that you don't care about common parlance
- Everyone loses, because this debate is now pointless and annoying
Yeah I watched the Some More News breakdown and it was certainly something lol
Reading this increased my blood pressure.
There is a great impression of him talking about Burger King that I have to share. He's doing this same kind of stupidity in this video. https://youtu.be/-BDgQMGs7Mc
It's mostly just that. The whole thing was a mess. The atheists were told they would be debating a Christian and prepared as such, but he won't define himself as a Christian. So much time is wasted dancing around that. They had to change the title from Christian debates to Jordan Peterson debates. On top of that he will barely engage properly, saying things like he won't entertain a hypothetical because he wouldn't allow himself to get in that situation in the first place. Just generally not acting in good faith.
he was seen crying while have an emotional outburst arguing someone recently.
This video analysing that is pretty good: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrdOamPIRGY
Some person was showing me videos of him and telling me he was very smart, does anyone happen to know some good examples to get him to reconsider?
Ask about his Benzo addiction that literally gave him brain damage. Which was what all his doctors predicted would happen.
a coma to get over his benzo withdrawal which is unsanctioned, since he went to russia.
any of the debates against Matt Dillahunty or Sam Harris. he gets spanked pretty bad. they are a long watch though.
Some More News has an interesting take down of JP from a couple of years ago that totally isn't 3 hours long that I really enjoyed. There's also a newer one released last week, but I haven't watched it yet.
If the person can watch him talk and come away with their opinion that's he's a genius they will be hard to convince otherwise.
Any video in which he's pandering to the Bible Belt Friends, in particular after 2020
Some of his Q/A with crowds after a talk also show him extremely defensive for no good reason - I remember a couple around 2019 or 2020, unfortunately I don't remember anything useful to locate them. These are not the ones he used to host from home mind you
This was made when JP was at his peak. In 2020 he was induced into a coma in Russia to treat his benzo addiction. The brain damage turned him into the fucked up crybaby version we see today. I'd give him even less credit than this video gives. (Although the vid is still great)
I always enjoyed CCK Philosophy's criticism on his understanding of postmodernism.
Vodka with my Big Mac
I've had that quite a few times. Doesn't really go together but rather they go sequentially. First you drink vodka then later on you want greasy shit
I genuinely can't think of a better example of a modern day sophist than Jordan Peterson.
That's debateble
After not receiving the fried Jordan cries in his car.
My father tried to tell me what a "genius" he is. I told my father point blank, Jordan Peterson is only a genius to morons. He even gave me one of Peterson's self help books, I immediately tossed it in the trash. Though, in retrospect, I probably should have tried to return it to Amazon and used the money to buy something more worthy of reading, like Chick Tracts. 😂 At least they're entertaining.
Sophists are not edgy and clever. They're asocial and annoying to be around.
I find it incredibly obnoxious when you are discussing or debating with someone and they start one of their replies with "so."
I sometimes just feel bad for him, like I want to give him a big hug and talk about addictions.
He's just such a sad man
top 100 comments