The inspector general’s report, published on 13 May, points to an inflection point in February, when two senior officials – the acting under secretary of war for policy, Elbridge Colby, and the secretary of the army, Dan Driscoll – separately proposed to Hegseth the program be cut or eliminated.

One proposal went further, according to the report, and recommended scrapping its action plan and its underpinning departmental instruction entirely. Then, without waiting for a response, the military began acting as if the cuts had already been approved.

Later that month, the US launched strikes on Iran.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 5 months ago

The cruelty is the point.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    Thank you, watchdog. It's great to have you but sad that we need you. I feel it should be the government's job to be open about such things.

    Also, one more proof that this admin is utterly corrupt and lacking any ethics. Put it on the pile which I hope will become useful one day.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    Later that month, the US launched strikes on Iran.

    They conducted an airstrike on a school that killed a horrific number of children and then proceeded to lie about it, so it can only be assumed it was done deliberately.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/law@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    They don’ need no steenkeng badges

  • source