top 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 70 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Who cares what these naysayers think, this data center will create as many as 26 new jobs!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    And think of the extra tax revenue!*

    *only from the income of those 26 people, because the data center business itself will get huge tax breaks for building in our state

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago

    I know you joke and I did have a chuckle. The tech jobs offered by these projects are so few and far between it is truly laughable.

    We’re fighting a data center construction by Google in our area. One of the major obstacles is that blue collar workers, electrical hvac etc, all believe this will bring them new jobs and continued work in maintenance of the facility over the years.

    They aren’t necessarily wrong on that point, and it’s a challenge to convince them that infrasound noises they can’t hear will make them sick over time.

    I wish they were this excited about building and maintaining solar and wind projects instead of data center generators, but alas, many of them are constantly subjected to propaganda painting green tech in a negative light.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 5 months ago

    It was fun explaining to my wife how resources in a public utility are pooled, and if someone comes along and takes 90% from the pool, the price on the remaining 10% goes up exponentially

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Does anyone actually know the stated purpose of this project? It surely can't just be for LLMs but I haven't been able to find anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Based on what Oleary said in his interview with Tucker Carlson, he doesn't have a tenant yet. So billionaires are building these datacenters with the expectation that hyperscalers like Google, Amazon, Microsoft will be renting that compute from them.

    Will that actually come to fruition in a way that justifies the billions invested? I guess we will see.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    Utah. Don't they have boatloads of those 2A idiots out there, that always scream about how they will stop evil governments when it happens?

    Well? We're waaiiting

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    They got what they voted for, its a bit late to complain now

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    What are they trying to do, simulate heaven for LDS members where they become Gods of their spirit children? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exaltation_(Mormonism)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Twice the size of manhattan? Where are we getting this number from? Thats not realistic in any sense. Just three centers place apart from each other and were counting all the deadspace in-between? Why do they need the space in-between?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    They claim the data center is on 62 square miles. Manhattan is 33.6 square miles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    So that Manhattan figure includes 10.8 sq miles of water.

    Regardless of the building footprint, the 40,000 acres limit of disturbance is impactful to local watersheds. Not to mention the plan it to create a (useless, IMO) device that consumes two-fold the energy as the entire state.

  • source
  • parent