all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Naive of anyone to think this is about safety when it’s clearly about shaping reality.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 7 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 29 points 6 months ago

    "Once again repeating the last thing he heard, elderly man now agrees with the ai industry"

  • source
  • [+] 24 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago

    Objectively untrue. He lacks the cognition to realize anything of the sort. "Mythos is so scary!!1!1" is a PR line.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    Trump doesn't even realize when he's soiled himself again.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    I'll give it a year before this "voluntary" evaluation becomes mandatory, while standards based on industry-leading models, dictate guardrails impossible to implement for upcoming models. And thus giving reason to consider would-be competitors' models a "national security risk": evaluated by a board, which by then, is composed of "experts" with a vested interest in the leading industry...

    Personally I believe AI models, using content for which they do not have the creator's explicit permission, have no right to exist (at least as a commercially available product).

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    He doesn't realize shit for more than a few minutes at a time.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    AI safety testing under Trump is just another way to slow down competition for Musk's xAI.

    Elon is a boss at paying off government to slow down any competition.

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Spooked by Anthropic's paranoia-inducing hype, of course.

    "AI safety" has nothing to do with preventing psychosis, or addressing pollution or rampant electricity use (real problems). States are still banned - by Trump - from addressing those.

    What is it? Well, it's nothing, basically. It's a fear of something that doesn't exist, doesn't have a path to existing, so deciding whether something is "safe" is bound to be based on which big tech corpo lobbies the hardest.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    More realistic is previewing to see if they should keep it for themselves.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Does it known something about him?

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/artificial_intel@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    The clear pattern of him deciding to throw something out and then realizing that it's actually very important, he should really read about chesterton's fence it's a shame that he can't read.

    You don't need an LLM to find that pattern.

  • source