all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 6 months ago

Good read. I've not heard of this site before, so now I'll check out some of their older stuff! Looks like a few years of content history to browse 🙂.

Thanks for sharing!

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago

    Super interesting read, thanks for sharing this

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    I love fooling Shazam, listen to a college radio station and it can’t id anything.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure it's magic.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago

    What a brilliant and interactive article, thanks for this.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Like how interactive the page is

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 9 points 6 months ago

    A technical post in the Technology community, nice!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I've also noticed this is why Shazaam is shit even at a concert by the original band.

    The link alludes to this when it talks about shazaam not handling us singing a song very well, but it strikes me as most stark when it's even the original artist.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I really liked this article! Thanks for the link. Gonna check out their QR Code article next

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago
    [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    That's brilliant, thank you!

    They should cover JPEG compression at some point; when I first learned how that worked (at uni nearly 40 years ago... God) I was blown away by how beautiful that algorithm is.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Pattern matching.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Is there something like this that can be used on a folder with mp3 or FLAC files and find out what it is and rename them correctly?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment