This article is about Claude Desktop, the Electron-based macOS application
So you are bitching a chrome browser reconfiged your other chrome browser.....
This article is about Claude Desktop, the Electron-based macOS application
So you are bitching a chrome browser reconfiged your other chrome browser.....
Once again, brave browser sucks. Use Firefox or a Firefox fork if you want any real security.
I don't think Firefox is immune to this, just that because its architecture is different, Anthropic didn't bother coding a bridge for it (given its market share).
The main issue here is that Anthropic violated one of the most important (implicit) tenets of applications in a computer: don't touch other people's shit. Claude.app modified Brave (and others) configuration, adding an extension without user consent. An extension that, by the way, gives full control of the browser to Claude, including reading the DOM for browser tabs unrelated to Claude (for example, the one where you just entered your credit card details).
I can't believe how many decades we got out of just letting all apps have full access to $HOME. In $current_year it's our own fault if we don't properly isolate our applications I guess. Android does a pretty good job of it IMO although cross-app intents probably need more protection.
Technically, at least as far as the author can tell, it only affects Chromium-based browsers. So Firefox would not be affected (yet).
And only on Mac so far, the app being made with ElectronOS. Not sure what Windows looks like.
What's Brave got to do with this? The article (that you didn't read) goes into detail about how Anthropic places these files in the directory for any Chromium-based browser.
While brave itself is only a minor character in this story, it is Chromium based. I was merely pointing it out. You'd be surprised how many push the brave browser on Lemmy.
What is it with Lemmy users posting semi-unrelated comments just to make a point?
You can't post anything in the Android or GooglePixel communities without 4 "ditch Google, use Graphene" comments.
It really doesn't make for an engaging community that one wants to partake in.
I'm pretty sure I do not represent the com as an individual.
No but you're doing a good job fuelling the stereotype 😃
Don’t use chrome, problem solved.
somebody did not read the article
Proprietary software contains spyware. Sky is blue. Water is wet.
Open source software you don’t code review and build yourself can also contain spyware.
while it can, there probably is some arch user who runs the program too and notices it suddenly takes 2ms longer to do something thusly finding the xz attack.
so, yeah foss isn’t inherently safe, but most probably saf er
Projects that have lots of attention and assuming you always compile from source. But someone could easily distribute a binary that is different than the source.
People should do frequent audits, especially network traffic. I had this one file manager that was kinda like Midnight Commander. Someone on a forum said “check out me app” etc. immediately on launch it made network requests…… why? Anyway, definitely don’t use that for long!!
They're listed in the installation pages from what I recall. I unselected them and have no spurious browser extensions installed.
Claude Desktop may be lacking controls and docs on how they integrate with browsers extension, but the write up seems overly dramatic.
It's not clear any browser extension actually were installed in the browser on the author's system. Until such extension is installed, the native messenging manifest are inactive, no browser would use them. This standard web technology allow, by design, for specific browser extensions to reach to specific apps outsider the sandbox. A pairing occurs, where the native app allow only specific extensions (cf pre-installed manifest), and the extension request a specific app. Both need to occur to allow the communication.
Looking at one the extension info on the chrome store, it's obvious what they do. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/claude/fcoeoabgfenejglbffodgkkbkcdhcgfn
I would trust neither app nor extension in my system, not without extra sandboxing, as an abundance of caution. But this write-up comes up short of showing spyware behavior.
all 18 comments