all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 116 points 6 months ago
[–] 41 points 6 months ago* (12 children)

"Kirk, who had begun to turn against Israel and refused approaches from Israel lobbyists just before his death"

hell of an opening sentence there i can see what The Canary Dot Co is implying but uh seems a little irresponsible

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (10 children)
  • [+] -21 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    By using the same strategy the Germans used to do the Holocaust. "Jews, who burned down the Reichstag building..."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    I hope you are aware that the state of Israel is a different entity than the Jewish people or the Jewish religion?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I didn't mention Israel, and the Reichstag building was in Germany. Israel didn't even exist at the time the Reichstag building burned. Germans didn't exterminate Jews because Israel burned the Reichstag building.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Kirk, who had begun to turn against Israel...

    Same strategy used in Holocaust!

    Israel ≠ Jewish people.

    I didn't mention Israel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    You don't see the irony in me criticizing the German fascists Nazis from the 1940s, and right away, people jump in with "!!!??!! Jews are not israel, and Israel are not Jews." I'm told that comparing what Israel is doing to the Holocaust is very anti-Semitic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 55 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    this claim originated from some podcast not any actual document that's even remotely credible

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    In this and other reporting, the Canary shows itself to be a complete nonsense rag. But because this stupid "timing" conspiracy feeds into the political narrative supported by users here, they're going to think it has legs. They don't oppose conspiracies based on critical thinking. They oppose them based on what politics they support.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    This author, and likely the whole publication, can be dismissed as they repeat the “bullet does not match the gun” lie over and over in the article.

    To help clear up the misconception: While not having reviewed the ATF’s report on the bullet fragment examination, Robinson’s attorneys stated “the ATF was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied”.

    His own lawyers weren’t even saying they didn’t match, just that the investigation didn’t conclusively (enough) prove they do (in their opinion)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    His own lawyers aren't even saying he couldn't have written those Discord messages - he was in jail! The whole article is about a conspiracy against their client the defense isn't even siding with. It's utter bollocks, and Lemmings pushing it is shameful.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Well, it's been two days. Has this gaping hole been covered in the mainstream press, or are they in on the conspiracy?

  • source
  • 89 comments in c/world view that post