Pages that are engaging in back button hijacking may be subject to manual spam actions or automated demotions, which can impact the site's performance in Google Search results. To give site owners time to make any needed changes, we're publishing this policy two months in advance of enforcement on June 15, 2026.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 6 months ago

Microsoft, one of the largest offenders, over here caring exactly zero shits.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago
    45 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 112 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Hell yeah. Too many news sites being you to their main page when you hit the back button.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I didn't know this kind of thing was possible until recently. I straight up couldn't leave a site because of hijacking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 6 months ago

    I almost never encounter it anymore because I habitually just open a new tab for everything. A habit I started doing because encountering it made me so angry I almost swore off computers altogether

    Super niche adjacent rage but shoutout to max-for-live developers who implement their Ableton plugins as a series of user actions so that the instant you touch the plugin it detonates your entire undo history

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    long click on the "back button" will list the history of the tab you'll be able to select the search history

    (ay least on Firefox)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Or right-click.

    Unless the site also spams the history to fill that list so that you can't use it. Yes, I've seen that happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    RIP to the Microsoft support forums, then. Although if these get tanked in the search results that will probably be a small net benefit for society given that not a single problem has ever been successfully solved by the Microsoft support forums in the entire history of computing.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Bro you just need to run sfc /scannow one more time. Just trust me bro

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That didn't work? Did you reinstall yet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    This is almost as annoying as websites disabling right click (there is an extension that re-enables it on command though)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Or disabling paste in password and bank account fields. Which is a literal crime in the US but never enforced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • God I hate when apps don’t have properly marked fields. You can mark your fields as username/password/street address/phone number/etc and browsers will automatically be able to detect them. So they can suggest autofill for the respective fields. But so many sites just… Refuse to properly mark their fields?

    I know autofill hijacking was a problem for a while. For instance, a malicious ad could have off-screen autofill fields. So your browser would autofill them and the ad would capture the data. It was super scummy, and is why browsers moved towards prompting for autofill instead of just doing it automatically. But this is no excuse for sites to break paste on their own fields. It adds nothing to security, and only encourages weak passwords.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Wait.... This sounds... Good?

    That can't be right, this is 2026, we cannot possibly be watching a tech company do an actual good thing.

    They didn't even shove AI in there. This has gotta be fake, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 45 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Why weren't they going after this 10 years ago? I think I've just gotten into the habit of "open in new tab" because I know there's a good chance "back" won't do what I want.

    Frankly, here on PieFed, "back" to a feed isn't very useful, because you'll just land somewhere in the feed, not back to the place where you started. "Open in new tab" solves that as well, for certain very small values of "solves."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    oh shit I thought that was just a brave/tablet problem on Lemmy. It's definitely mildly infuriating to have been moved down half the feed when hitting back, thought the browser was recognizing I was halfway down a comment section or something so it was registering the movement when I went back or something. On PC I just do new tabs (habit) like you said so I never notice it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    I remember a long time ago complaining about a shitty pattern like this (specifically, bombing your history by artificially making a shitload of redirects and thus making the back button useless. Probably the old school way to do this shit). Back then I was told by web devs "this is how the web works, you can't have a browser detect and block this!".

    Fuck that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Well it's about time they do something impact full and useful. This would be a useful thing I think

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago

    Honestly good move. While i never get redirected, most i get is website begging for click. "Are u leavin? Plz don't leave, here's mor articl you might be interested with" no thanks and fuck you.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    While they're at it, could they please also penalize Android app developers who do this too?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I have successfully taught my children that if they play a game that requires ads between attempts at playing the game, that usually is faster to force close the game and start from the beginning again than wait for the ad to finish.

    I'm so proud to see them just "nope" out of ads immediately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Good practice, but consider putting something like Dnsnet on the phone to fully block all ads:

    https://f-droid.org/packages/dev.clombardo.dnsnet

    It starts a small "VPN" client that will filter incoming/outgoing traffic for any add content and kill it before it gets sent. Its free and works great on any android device, rooted or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I have a pi-hole at home to block them when they're on Wi-Fi. I'll look into that for when they're out and about

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Toss nextdns.io into the mix if you have technical chops. Its a great way to filter ads at the DNS level that is also free. I use that in my pi hole setup as the DNS to just layer and layer on more filtering.

    Sponsorblock is also great for things that YouTube videos to filter out ad reads/self promo/etc in YouTube videos.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago

    I for one would like to take a moment to enjoy this small win and bask in the idea of there being actual improvements in technology.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago

    Coming from the creator of a search engine that does "anchor hijacking" where it sends a request about what link you click even if you hover over the link and only see the original URL in the bottom.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago

    A lot of online tests are going to get a lot easier, hehe

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago

    Yesssss, broken clock theorem at work

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Who the fuck added this "feature" anyways. Pages shouldn't have any control over history in the first place.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Humans are weird and UX wants the web app to behave how humans expect it to behave. That's how we got here. There's a whole host of reasons why manipulating browser history is awful, but here we are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Rare Google W.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Wait this is a generic web thing? Or limited to google chrome? I got confused

  • source