all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 50 points 7 months ago*

Assuming the "Pythagoras" reference was unintentional (just a famous mathematician pulled out of a hat) makes this even funnier given Pythagoras was a notable proto-vegan:

As long as Man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower living beings, he will never know health or peace. For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other. Indeed, he who sows the seed of murder and pain cannot reap joy and love.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Wait did Pythagoras even know about zero? Like iirc he’s wayy before standard numerals and zero didn’t start becoming mainstream in the west ‘till long after that right?

    (Speaking of, it always blows my mind that someone was able to give a proof of the irrationality of the square root of 2 without even using numbers)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Also twice as much as an average meat eater would only make up for one vegan. He would have to eat millions of times the amount to make up for all the vegans.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 13 comments in c/vegan@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 34 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    Is this a coincidence or intentional? Pythagoras was a notable proto-vegan:

    As long as Man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower living beings, he will never know health or peace. For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other. Indeed, he who sows the seed of murder and pain cannot reap joy and love.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I always found this such a demented take, because like why are they so tilted by the idea of NOT eating meat? Do they truly believe that it's ethically defensible, or are they actually relishing the idea of participating in increasing the net suffering in the world?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    They have their ego invested in the idea. They can't defend it logically, but everyone knows they are a good person, so their conclusion is it's stupid because if it's not stupid then they are less than a good person...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (6 children)

    (1x2)+0=2

    If he is eating twice as much meat than before then the total meat consumption has doubled.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    "Im gonna eat twice the animals YOU do", not ".. twice the animals I used to"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    They think picking a random sample means it must be equal to the average.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    So, they'll prolly die of congestive heart failure 20 years earlier, meaning... 80 years of meat consumption minus 20 years of life = 120 years of lifetime consumption at a 2x meat consumption rate... If both you and they'd eaten an omnivore diet and lived to 80 that'd be 160 years of cumulative consumption so we're still ahead.

    I hope their principals make up for their significantly reduced quality of life

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    The correct quote from Maddox is "for every animal you don't eat, I'll eat two"

  • source