top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 7 months ago

This makes sense. I can't see Trump being willing to back down, but I can see corporate pressure doing it.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago*

    If they also target Amazon and Tesla, they have my support. Tbh Tesla wouldn't even be hard to attack, just yeet some molotovs at the dealership from a few cheap drones or by hand depending on how openly you are going for.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    So these companies are planning to implement WFH policies now, right?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    I'll say this for Iran: They're happy to take Trump's scorched-earth ball and run with it. And they're known to have hacking teams with such capabilities, so ignoring this shot against the bow is folly.

    Basically, it's "You're here for our oil. We're here for your entire economy."

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    How can it be, that the Iranian terror regime appears more simpatic than the current US Government?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Really bad day for making threats if they want them to be taken seriously.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    You know, I gotta say, that might just serve them right. Those billionaire owners sucking on the teat of president inmate #P01135809 just might some comeuppance.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago
    64 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    33 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    1 comment in c/globalnews@lemmy.zip view that post