all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 7 months ago

Tricksy hobbitses! What has it got in its pocketses boxeses? What is superposition, precious?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    He forgot to swap doors

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Statisticses! They gives us filthy probabilities, precious! Tricksy physicistses too lazy to find the real answers, yes yes!

  • source
  • 40 comments in c/science_memes@mander.xyz view that post
    [–] 81 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (9 children)

    Nasty hobitses did not mention radioactive particle decay or poison vile vial! Cat is just dead dead dead!! Suffocated, starved, sensory deprived cat!

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (6 children)

    Wait... So the radioactive material or poison is meant to keep the cat alive? 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

    no, the vial of poison and radioactive particle connected to a device that breaks the vial when it detects the particle's decay is what makes the cat's state probabilistic. Otherwise it's just a cat in a box

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    A box without a lid, no way to check on the cat, and no air holes. That cat is dead. It was always going to die.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago*

    Are you also dead because you're guaranteed to die eventually? It's not an experiment of the eventual outcome but the observation of the outcome. While you're observing the cat it has to be alive or dead, it can't be both. But when you stop observing the certainty disappears and the cat is no longer dead or alive but both at the same time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    What's really in the box are the 12 year old girls Schroedinger used to rape

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    What

    Edit: okay yep wow that's true. Damn. Okay. Today's lesson was not in quantum mechanics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    From Forbes:

    Quoting directly from Schrödinger’s diaries, Moore revealed that the physicist justified his attraction to girls by considering that, being a genius (which he believed no woman ever could be), he was naturally entitled. “It seems to be the usual thing that men of strong, genuine intellectuality are immensely attracted only by women who, forming the very beginning of the intellectual series, are as nearly connected to the preferred springs of nature as they themselves. Nothing intermediate will do, since no woman will ever approach nearer to genius by intellectual education than some unintellectuals do by birth so to speak.”

    TIL. Ugh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    is the cat a qualifed observer>

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Shouldn’t they both be right

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    No, the cat is one or the other. Radioactive half-life is the point at which there is a 50/50 chance that any single isotope had decayed, and we usually work around that in classical systems by using large sample sizes (a pile of isotopes, it's easy to see that half of it would have decayed). But for one single isotope we aren't observing (or the cat), we need to look at it in terms of probabilities until we observe it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The correct answer is yes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    Eventually dead, from multiple potential causes. Especially with no lid.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    just shake the box up a bit. you'll soon know if the cat inside is alive or dead!?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    ... It'd be a lot easier to explain this if Schroedinger had a whole pile of boxes with cats in them

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    oh god you just made me write the stupidest nerdiest song about schroedinger in about half a second and the chorus goes "and he's got boxes and boxes and boxes of cats/ yeah he's got boxes and boxes and boxes of cats" i feel so ashamed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago
    [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    The cat was Schrödingers example how super positions make no sense in complex organisms. It was a counter-example, yet everyone uses it as if there would be a undead cat in the box.

  • source