all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Good news is I dont think you need the charge at that point.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    Hmm. You know, if it's something like an MBT it may remained sealed in some way, for all I know. A bunch of aluminum at mach 1.5 is going to have significantly less cutting power than a rod of depleted uranium at mach 3. A whole plane might have a crushing effect that no normal-sized munition would, though. And then there's the fire raging over top of whatever is left.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    Replace the armored unit with a 1997 Toyota pickup and you're on to something here.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    The units are wrong but the ratio is completely credible when you consider how the US has been intercepting drones

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)