While global stocks have largely sustained ‌the relief rally that followed Monday's wild swings, fear is again resurfacing as Iran vowed to step up its missile strikes.

President Donald Trump's assurance that the war with Iran was "very complete" and could be "over soon" initially injected optimism into markets, even as Iranian hardliners rallied behind new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and said their blockade of oil would continue.

Within hours of Trump's statements, Iran's military dashed ⁠markets' hopes. "We are the ones who will determine the end of the war," Iran's Revolutionary Guards said.

Such comments brought the exchange back to a familiar tempo with Trump then threatening to hit Iran "TWENTY TIMES HARDER than they have been hit thus far."

all 53 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

Trump struggles to understand the most basic question of warfare, which is "What are my strategic objectives?"

To put that in simpler language, "what do you want to get out of this?"

To put this in context, it's important to understand that, in purely strategic terms, the second, Iraq war war successful. Keep in mind that "successful" doesn't mean "a good idea". It was horrendously immoral, did serious longterm damage to the US' global standing and reputation, cost far too much in lives and dollars, and caused untold harm to the people living in that region. But the goal for the US was to install a compliant government and gain access to military staging points in the region. They succeeded. The cost was far too high, the execution was an endless series of blunders, and they shouldn't have done it for numerous reasons, ethical and practical, but they did technically succeed in their objectives.

If we were to hazard a guess at Trump's goal with this military action against Iran - and we have to guess to some degree, because Trump has offered so many different justifications - probably the most consistent goal would be "Regime change." This has been a fairly standard goal for US policy; replace a hostile regime with a compliant one.

So far they have not achieved anything remotely close to that. The exact opposite, in fact. Arguably, the Iranian regime is now more strongly entrenched and more firmly anti-American than it has been in years. There is little hope for a return to the negotiating table, and the nascent revolution that was brewing prior to the war has been severely damaged, especially by idiotic, self-defeating actions like bombing a girl's school.

If this war is complete, then it has been one of the least successful wars America has ever prosecuted. Not the most costly by any metric, but the degree to which they have managed to damage their own interests in such a short period of time might be unprecedented.

Many Iranians and some Americans are dead. A lot of military hardware has been expended and destroyed on both sides. But none of those things constitute a goal, or meaningful progress towards one. America's actual strategic goals in the region are now significantly further away.

Do I believe that Trump will try to declare victory and walk away anyway? Absolutely. In fact I think it's probably the most likely outcome. This is a consistent pattern with Trump. He doesn't have the attention span for long term projects, and war is very much a long term project. He loves military power, but he loves to exercise it in brief, explosive orgies of destruction. He's a man of instant gratification. Pure, unbridled id.

But what it will take to get what he wants out of this - if he actually focuses on his goals for long enough to recollect what they are - is boots on the ground, and that will be one of the hardest and bloodiest military campaigns the US has seen in a very long time.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Well, y that metric, it’s successful. He wanted to flex and bomb. He did. That was the goal. Mission accomplished.

    People keep ascribing normal behaviours and motivations to Trump. He clearly doesn’t fit in that box due to mental health issues. He neither understands the purposes of his actions nor has the foresight to see their effect. It’s all reaction, but as long as the emperor continues to have clothes, it works, unfortunately. Those around him can manipulate him until he turns on them. It’s a constant shuffling of loyalties and policies for self benefit.

    It’s assumed this was Israel’s doing. Not trumps. As are all his actions. Someone else is pulling his strings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    This is a completely valid point, and I don't disagree with the idea that Trump simply did not have any strategic goal in mind when he started this war. I nodded in that direction in my previous comment. I'm definitely not presuming long term thought. Not sure how you would have gotten that impression from my describing him as a being of pure id, incapable of long term planning. You did read far enough for that part, right?

    Anyway, I'd still contend that "Bomb shit and feel powerful", while objectives, do not qualify as strategic objectives. Its certainly possible those were Trump's only goals - and it does look like he mostly got dragged into this by Isreal anyway - but if that's the case then we have to conclude that it's impossible for the war to be anything other than a failure, strategically, because you cannot achieve your strategic goals if you don't have any.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Or, if you’ve no strategic goals, you never really fail. It’s a matter of perpspective. And when friendly media take his word as does a cult following, that perspective will be magnified.

    I agree, you’re looking at his actions similarly to me, but you’re trying to fit that into an assessment compared to peers or conventional thinking and/or planning. He doesn’t follow norms as he’s not normal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (1 child)

    See, I think this is a mistake people make a lot with Trump. They start at "Trump doesn't follow norms" which is a completely true and correct statement, and continue to "Trump has proven that a lot of our assumptions about politics are incorrect", which is also true and correct, but then they seemingly progress from there to a position that tends to land somewhere around "Trump is an eldritch being unbound by all laws of reality."

    Obviously, I'm being hyperbolic there, but it really does seem like a lot of the thinking about Trump skews that way. People over-correct from our assumptions and norms to this world where nothing will ever affect Trump because he's got some kind of magical power to warp reality.

    Trump exists in the same physical universe we all do. When something happens that breaks our understanding of reality, it's not magic, it just means that our understanding was based on faulty assumptions. Trump is forcing us to update and correct a lot of our assumptions about political realities, but he's still bound by political realities. We just need to understand those realities better. His support is steadily crumbling, and we can see that in both how his poll numbers are falling, and how he is panicking about the mid-terms. Whether Iran will meaningfully affect that support is an open question, and whether or not Iran can be judged as a strategic success does not necessarily have any bearing on that question. Whether or not the Iran war is a political success, for example, would be an entirely separate question.

    But just because the question of strategic success or failure in Iran doesn't necessarily matter to the question of political success or failure, doesn't mean that we can't still ask the question. It's not about trying to fit Trump into any kind of box, it's just about judging him, and his administration, by all of the criteria available.

    It's important to ask these questions, and be clear about the answers, because there will be a myriad of defenders of his who will parrot any claim he makes that Iran was a success, however it goes down. There's no reason for us to allow his lackeys to freely rewrite history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I agree with what you're saying. I also think it's important to seperate trump as a person to trump as a political entity or trumpism (maga) as a cause.

    Trump gets away with stuff, bit because we let him, but because he demands it and does everything to get it. Someone else might retire in disgrace. Hell make claims of fraud and try and incite violent upheaval to auit his purposes.

    It's not so much that he is exempt from consequences, political or legal, it's that those consequences aren't being upheld. It's very groupthink and emperora new clothes. If he thought he was immune, he wouldn't need to get rid of opposition and stack everywhere with allies and yes men.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    That’s great, now we can get back to talking about how the rapist president is also a pedophile.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    They don't have the armaments. Bluster all you want ya fat oaf. This isn't a boardroom, this is the global stage. Get bent!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (40 children)

    America needs to get fucked and I hope this Trump administration breaks it apart. What a pathetic excuse for leadership, pro billionaire, protecting rapists, what the hell kind of timeline is this. No sympathies for any ill that happens internally to murica. And this excuse of not voting Trump doesn't hold, he speaks for all America like it or not, he is the face of what American politics allow and how easy it is to rig.

  • source
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (39 children)

    Hey thanks for being pissy, how about some help?

    There are many of us who feel like you do, and we’re stuck here. Then you come in and shout “fuck you” in my face because… …I hate it too? Cool, great work - did you make yourself feel better at least?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 8 months ago (38 children)

    Yeah, I will shout fuck you to your face, where's your second amendment militias in the face of this governance, where are you crippling the country to rid yourselves of this evil. Not even a general strike. No, you collectively made your beds and now you lie in them. I know all your excuses, people are living paycheck to paycheck and can't afford to strike, that's a you problem, you, again, voted to give corporations the power to fuck your workers, you call Bernie Sanders a socialist while he was probably the only politician in the past few decades who actually gave a shit about the average American. You deserve what you're getting, Sincerely, Someone who's lived through American bombs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago* (36 children)

    So you didn’t even make yourself feel better.

    You want to know where my personal second amendment militias are? What does that even mean, you’re not talking to the news I’m a real fucking person you weirdo. Don’t you fucking think we wish we could fix it?

    Happy to hear suggestions - but of course you have nothing to offer but anger. You want to push us into violence, because it’s all you know.

    I feel sorry for you, at least we still have hope.

    edit: You are absolutely no fan of Sir Pratchett, as he would spit in your face for claiming to love his works while actively hating others the way you do. Shame on you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    Yeah, they're just a prick who can't understand that people are trapped here. They cannot understand that the billionaire class intentionally trapped the lower (and much of the middle) class, and think that everyone here is perfectly content with what's happening. So much for class solidarity, funny that they call themselves a leftist.

    They'd rather see the lower class either get murdered one by one in the streets (because unless there's millions of us at once, that's what will happen). They haven't thought very far ahead, and for some reason they think that if the government cracks down on us that it'll cause the collapse of the US. I don't think that's true, and in fact, I think it would only give the feds a tighter grip and allow them to fight additional illegal wars.

    It's interesting to see them be happy that their supposed fellow leftists are losing their right to vote. Not just happy, in fact.. they want left leaning voters to fear voting. Just like Trump and the GOP. Funny how that works.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 8 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    Wow isn’t that the dumbest comment I’ve read today. Great work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago (24 children)

    It's all I know because that's what America has shown me. I'm not angry, I'm glad you're tasting the shit, your rights are being impeded (much like the rights of all those people who's lives are shot because you prop up dictators for your security). If you think you have hope, the billionaire class will soon teach you there is none. As for violence, you've exported so much of it for so long all over the world it's about time you understood that while you may be far away from the shit you cause, it will eventually get to you. And no need to feel sorry for me, I've been a diaspora my whole life because of you and your Israeli puppet masters it's actually given me a brilliant understanding of several cultures you'll likely never experience. No, America's days of pretend democracy are over and you're finally seeing the face we've always know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (21 children)

    What an absolutely shitty way to be

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (20 children)

    Call it shitty, call it whatever you want, but my sentiment is echoed in a lot of areas in the world America has fucked over time and again. I used to differentiate between Trumps Maga Evangelicals and the rest of you, but Trump twice is you guys just fucking around. There is very little sympathy for you internationally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (19 children)

    Bigotry is pretty popular, I'm aware. Great job running with that torch. It is extremely shitty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (18 children)

    The state of mind of a bigot; obstinate and unreasoning attachment of one's own belief and opinions, with narrow-minded intolerance of beliefs opposed to them. I'm a leftist believe it or not, I care about people, I believe in equality, all those lovely words you lot use when forcing "democracy" on other countries. But the actions of your government has put my family in direct danger, again, so what I'm portraying isn't bigotry, it's I've had enough of your shit and I hope you get a taste of your own medicine. Countless republican wars waged on the middle east all based on lies and resources that have killed hundred of thousands, directly and indirectly. Welcome to the real world, where people eventually resent you, much like an abusive toxic relationship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (17 children)

    I care about people

    Unless they are American. A lot of us have been opposing half the shit this country does for the past few decades we've been alive. But go on, hate us and blame us too. That's what bigotry is. You already know me because I'm American. Let the hatred flow through you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (16 children)

    And how has your protesting gone, have you held your government (s) accountable. FFS you can't even apprehend pedofiles!! Your entire system is rotten to the core and Trump is just the end result. So yes, some of you are protesting, but that counts for fuck all when your successive governments carry on as usual. AT least Bush made a pretense of WMD? Trump just barks to Israeli commands. You are represented on the world stage by your government, and your government is rotten. It is rigged against the average American and a large chunk of you are stupid enough to fall for the Reaganomics of trickle down, which has given rise to the billionaire class who are now dictating domestic and foreign policy. Take a lesson from Europe and especially the French on how to deal with a hostile government. It's pathetic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (15 children)

    It's pathetically stupid also to conflate a government with its powerless citizens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (14 children)

    Up to a point, after decades of the same, it looks like this is America. Citizens are not powerless, you've been made to believe that by the oligarchs, general strikes should be the norm by now if such a majority of you are against this but instead we have Lindsey Graham bleating on about how much money America will make. The fact that Israel has universal healthcare and you guys don't because "socialism" is very telling considering you're the ones paying for it. I'm sorry but America on the world stage is ALL of you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (13 children)

    There isn't a discussion here. You're a bigot and I've told you that. This is just you trying to justify it, but that cannot happen

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    And you are an enabler. Thanks to your inability over decades to stop wars decided by a terrorist apartheid state, you have once again allowed the middle east to burn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    Are you gonna tell us how many wars you have stopped now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Unfortunately I'm not rich or corrupt enough to be on your American board of peace, so none.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    America has a hegemony on violence, and YOUR president has set up a wonderful board of peace which includes all the dictators and despots, unfortunately I do not have the cash to join. Maybe talk to the newly appointed to the Air Force Academy Erika Kirk, who doubtless has a lot of experience in military matters. I'm curious as to what it would take for you to change the shit show that is America today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 8 months ago* (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    It seems you're using a MAGA talking point, I don't elect American officials, therefore I cannot enable them. If you have no answer to my question about what it would take for you to get off your collective asses you can say so. Stop being ridiculous or I'll start to blame you for protecting a pedofile ring

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Wy are you bothering with a bigot then? Why not bother the far right in power? Surely they've done more damage than me hurting your feelings with my realism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 8 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    And I have a hatred of scrambling to get family out of war zones because bombs are falling on them. Have you ever experienced that? If not I suggest shut the fuck up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] -3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    edit: You are absolutely no fan of Sir Pratchett, as he would spit in your face for claiming to love his works while actively hating others the way you do. Shame on you. I wonder what Pratchett would say of the silent majority, who only start to complain when the leopard starts chewing on their face.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment