This new "privacy" law will require that all operating system providers must start collecting your birth date every app you install will need to ask your OS provider for that information. It's whac...

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 21 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

Other states are going to have the same kind of laws...and some go farther than Cali is going to right now: https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/many-more-us-states-are-planning-or-already-have-operating-system-age-verification-laws/

This is just the latest.

so now we may have a forked/pirate linux distros because people dont want to be age restricted and phone home.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I already have several Linux isos in my torrent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    No it is not. There is no way this is enforceable. At all.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    That sounds positive. For us to see what you see, can you elaborate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Not the original commenter, but from what I've read, the laws would require operating systems to collect name and DOB in the user account setup process. No facial scans, photos, IDs or other verification required, so it seems very easily bypassed by simply lying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    And beyond that, couldn't one just access the non-Cali version? If they want me to verify my age, I'll just add lying about where I live to the list.

    Fortunately, I'm from California-east (New Jersey), and we have actual problems over here, and so this isn't on the list. Yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Without a key you won't be able to access restricted material.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Excuse me while I die laughing. Sure you regulated a site on the internet... But did you regulate all of them?

    See also: the completely non existent piracy sites... And let's be honest every other thing that they totally scrubbed off the internet...

    It'd be a shorter list to list things they successfully got rid of...

    I'll start:

    ...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I will roll my own distro before I provide my data to the state or the corpos

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    It really isn't.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    I'm sure every ATM, every kiosk, any machine accessible by a child will be updated to detect and immediately adjust it's function accordingly without any issues /s

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    Nope. You can't enforce it.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    Why can't OS providers say that they don't operate in California anymore and be done with it?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    Just because a law is passed, doesn't mean you need to follow it. Just act like the 1%

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    I guess going onwards most people will have their birthdate on 01/01/1970.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    This happens when the people who define a law have no idea what they are talking about.

    Even our central controller device would fall under this regulation. Which is so stupid that it hurts.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Unless there are any real consequences from having an OS on your hardware that doesn't comply, I would just expect most Linux users to grab their install images from mirrors hosted out of state. Even if they amend it to require the mirrors to try and locate visitors to automatically redirect California residents to the tampered images, a VPN would solve that pretty quickly. This just seems like posturing and maybe testing the waters with public reaction, but I'd be more concerned about what the crazier thing is that they'll ramp up to next if people don't raise a fuss over this one.

  • source
  • 41 comments in c/linux@lemmy.ml view that post
    35 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post
    11 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post