all 31 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 41 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Oh yeah, the casting was literally the only good part of those movies.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I love them for the same reason I love the old rotoscoped animated movies. I wish he hadn't been forced to pad that shit out to three movies, but I'm glad there's more Tolkien to see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Honestly, a skilled editor could probably chop all three movies down to a single pretty good movie. The filler is really the main thing that ruins them for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago* (5 children)

    If you feel the movie(s) had promise check the fan's cut.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Doesn't that cut all of White Council stuff?

    IMO adding the White Council was a great choice for the movies. The problem was that they added dragged-out unnecessary action scenes all over the story. The long escape from Goblin Town, turning the barrel escape into an action scene, the ridiculous (and awful CGI) molten gold thing in Erebor itself.

    A good cut should concentrate on bringing that stuff down. Not removing the White Council's concomitant exploration of Dol Guldur and expulsion of Sauron.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    the ridiculous (and awful CGI) molten gold thing

    Molten gold does not look like that!

    Molten gold looks like this: Basically, it looks just like any other molten metal -- brightly glowing yellow/red.

    If they had just made it look like actual melted metal, that would cure ~80% of the hatred I have for that scene.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    I think it depends on what the intent is for the cut. In this case, it was to provide a version that is as close to the book as possible. I agree that what you describe could be a good cut too, but the goal isn't the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    One cut I watched cut all the molten gold stuff. But you have to show smaug leaving the mountain and unfortunately he leaves dripping in gold so that looks kinda weird when you've cut all the stuff before that

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    The animated Hobbit movie got me to read the book.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Now that Bilbo was a real frood

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago
    [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Martin Freeman is a solid casting choice as John Watson, though they eventually did him the disservice of turning him into an appendage of Sherlock Holmes.

    Martin Freeman is perfect as Bilbo. His entire "I can't stand this goddamn adventure, I'd much rather be at home with a cup of tea and a sandwich" attitude was absolutely spot on.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    I actually never read any of the books and I picked up The Hobbit years after seeing the movie. There were a lot of things that I thought was added that's actually in the book.

    I watched all three ... I think I liked the first? I've never watched any of them again though. Like many others, I've seen the original LOTR trilogy many times over.

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I dunno. The casting of Orlando Bloom for the character not appearing in the book was odd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I disagree. I think Martin Freeman was a mediocre choice. He's a great actor but he doesn't have the warmth that Ian Holm had in the original trilogy. Freeman is too sarcastic.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments