no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
9 comments in c/minecraft@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 17 points 8 months ago
[–] 15 points 8 months ago

I tested it, and its legit

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Soooooo, what does this do?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Let's you play an old version of Minecraft?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Oh.....I thought with the source code leaking, it meant people could sign their own modified versions of minecraft.

    If it's just "lets you play", I don't see what's any different about this vs 2012 just downloading it from the PS store.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Unless I'm misunderstanding what you are referring to by signing:

    FWIW, A source code leak would not typically also include signing keys unless explicitly included. At any large org, there is a good chance only a handful of people will have access to a given signing key. So it's unlikely the method by which the code was accessed, would also provide access to signing keys

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    The original PS3 version of Minecraft was so good. Is one of those games that you loved even though you don't know why.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago
    1 comment in c/datahoarder@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I hope it gets recompiled 🙏🏻

  • source