top 57 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 43 points 8 months ago (5 children)

"You knew that your 'husband' was involved with a convicted child trafficker and rapist, why didn't you do anything to stop all that suffering?"

...
Paedo enabling evil bitch

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 16 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    I INTENSELY DON'T CARE. I REALLY DO NOT. AT ALL. I DON'T KNOW WHY PEOPLE KEEP INSISTING I CARE WHEN I CONTINUOUSLY TELL THEM THAT I DO NOT. IF YOU THINK I CARE THEN YOU ARE MISTAKEN AND SHOULD BE VERY ASSURED THAT I DON'T CARE EVEN A LITTLE BIT.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago

    You can never win an argument with someone who doesn't care about lying. Pedonald is the living proof. Americans know he's a pedo and doesn't care.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Are we still pretending that the rule of law is applied equitably?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 47 points 8 months ago (22 children)

    Ask her if she really participated in that ritual where they cut the face off of a young child while still alive and if she wore the face like a mask and made the child look at her own face, ask her that please.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    What the fuck is that sentence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    Yeah it's horrible if true. Some woman being interviewed said she was a survivor and witness to this happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    You know what? I want to go back to when it was just conspiracy theroies you told your friends when passing the joint around, like theres an evil cabal of reptilains who run the world, not face peeling pedophile cannibal child killers.

    I really, really hate reality atm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    There are only a few thousand people around the world who are doing this. As a collective, we could END THIS in a single afternoon. They all have home addresses and places where they sleep. They all go out to eat and they all drive around or fly out of airports that are predictable and trackable.

    There are resources for you to find these people.

    There are people in your neighborhood who would help you, if you can but find them.

    There are many people who would see nothing when you go by.

    The thought experiment I have been considering is that there is a child surrounded by 4 men with assault rifles. One of them is pouring gasoline over the child and pulling out a lighter. The child is screaming.

    There is a crowd of thousands of people surrounding this, all VIOLENTLY wagging their fingers and saying, "hey man, that's not cool. Don't do that."

    There is one person SCREAMING at everyone to fucking do something else to help. There aren't enough bullets for all of us.

    What is the correct response by the crowd?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    It's a diffusion of responsibility problem. The bigger the crowd, the less likely any individual is to take personal action. Also, the sum of that possibility (the likelihood that any member acts) also goes down.

    This is why big companies become amoral (and so can act immorally so easily).

    It's also why first aiders are taught to pick on people. Don't ask, "someone ring an ambulance!" instead you pick on someone. "You! In the yellow coat, ring a fucking ambulance for me, now!" It resets responsibility to an individual. It's also why good first aid courses make it clear YOU need to act, no matter how many people aren't.

    Unfortunately, at country and global levels, diffusion of responsibility becomes a problem. This is also why we have things like police and governments. It helps refocus responsibility onto a smaller group. The downside is that, if those groups get captured, then we are left floundering, unable to act.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    No no, sorry. The child died, surely, without a face. But this survivor was supposedly a witness to the ritual.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    I saw some interview with a woman who said she was witness to this happening, a survivor. Not sure if it was true so I want to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I'm very much lost on the context of this and the meme. We talking Hillary? Shes been accused of this, or the survivor knew Hillary witnessed it???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Talking Hillary, yeah. I saw a clip on Instagram where this lady was participating in a remote interview, and she was making these claims that I said in the first comment I made here. I wasn't able to find it again unfortunately. But there are rumor articles online of it, too.

    I just... have a really hard time picturing Hillary participating in something like that. She just seems like a sweet old lady to me, but at this point I can't rule anyone out. That's one of the scary parts in all of this. Everything needs to be investigated, I feel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    A good rule of thumb is that when something sounds unbelievable you should assume that the source is made up until you locate substantial evidence to confirm the claim. Nowadays, video clips are misrepresented or even fabricated altogether. If this particular claim had been spread far at all and a few days had passed, there would be articles online (at non-junk websites) discussing it. I'm not seeing any such articles in this case.

    My personal rule is not to mention such "big unverifiable claim" topics until I'm able to verify and educate myself on it. That avoids me feeling silly by being unable to respond to any probing questions about the big claim. It also avoids spreading the idea that the story is accurate. If all I can say is "I saw it in a feed full sourced from publishers that I don't necessarily trust" and the claim is unbelievably wild that's my "stop signal".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I mean, that's the normal way of processing of claims before the Epstein files. Even Bill Gates turns up and he had to apologize to his co-workers for the things revealed about him. And he seemed like a relatively chill guy to me as well. Everyone is involved. Even the princess of Norway. This is far and wide.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    Even if they called her to testify, she knows that she would have an accident. The news would go crazy for a few days, and then gradually fade away, but she'd be dead either way.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Can't believe covie-93 was already 33 years ago.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    Melania showed women they can [checks notes] 'live a life of luxury and never face concequences if the suck the richest dick they can find.'

    Yes, truly the greatest message a first lady can expound.

    /S for those who need it

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    The history we've seen around the Esptein Files demonstrates that, here in the US, no one involved is going to be held accountable in a meaningful way. I firmly believe that Epstein himself would still be operating and alive if Donald himself hadn't been elected.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago*

    Imagine believing the co-party will do anything at all about this if/when they take "power". smh.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] -8 points 8 months ago (16 children)

    Kinda lowkey racist?

    Can we not attack her without making fun of ESL?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    Saying immigrants better start practicing their English is the kind of stuff I would expect to hear from a Trump supporter.

    Attack her character not her capability to speak English as a non-native English speaker.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

    Her ability to speak english after living for decades here atop a new york sky scraper amd shitting in a golden toilet amd making a movie where she lies through her teeth about who and what she is all make her speech a part of her character.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 8 months ago* (8 children)

    🙄Okay fine don’t attack her for her character, attack her for being an immigrant who doesn’t speak good English.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (6 children)

    Give her the deference she would never give anyone. Take the high road while they molest your children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Or attack her for the actual bad things she has done and don't be a racist piece of shit yourself. But I get liberals find it hard to not be racist, so go figure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)

    Good thing the morality police are here to tell us to go easy on the fascists. Those boots can't lick themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Aww is someone upset at being told not to be racist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Because leftists who oppose liberal racism are bootlickers.

    You people truly deserve Trump, he reflects you all so well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    First of all, it is xenophobism not racism, but you aren't smart enough to understand that.

    I don't even agree with it other than the fact turnabout is fair play. You can't even drive truck without having a solid grasp of written and spoken English, but she can be on the UN Security Council representing the US!? It is a fucking joke.

    I am not going to pass judgement on anyone who is against this for any reason. The other side is overtly racist and turning their racist Magats against them using their shitty tactics is fucking great in my book. Fuck them.

    And here you are. The jimmy cricket for liberals or whatever the bullshit that is your current schtick. You are just a fascist apologist probably from another fascist nation. I will politely ask you to get bent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Ofc. This is a lib meme based on a complete fantasy. They gotta throw in some low key racism for their base.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments