all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

Slammed? Isn't christofascism what they're going for? That's not a negative in their eyes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 26 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 83 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    Nothing says pro life than killing anyone who receives an abortion, even if the abortion is to save the life of the mother which is the case for: Preeclampsia/Eclampsia, Placenta Previa/Accreta, Previable PPROM, Cardiac/Renal Disease, and Ectopic Pregnancy

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Most people actually agree on the same thing once you get down into the details of abortion. For some reason everyone likes to lump themselves into "pro-life" or "pro-choice" camps and then argue about the extreme takes from either side.

    https://news.gallup.com/poll/321143/americans-stand-abortion.aspx

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    It's because the pro life people are fed bullshit about pro choice people, like they get pregnant just so they can murder babies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    The article specifically says there are exceptions in the bill which includes to save the life of the mother.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    The less obvious fucked up part is how do you suppose they determine whether an exception was met? Do you think that is happening before the law enforcement goons have access to personal medical data?

    Almost certain that at the very least, having a medically necessary abortion will get your private health records turned over to the police. You will become an investigation target and have your privacy violated before they can even possibly know whether you fall under an exception. Mix in the general disposition of police and the specific conflicting interest of stalker/abusive cops who will have no motivation to protect the people in these situations and you have a system designed to put every pregnant person in the US in the sights of PD firearms.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    One day, there will be a reckoning...I hope these men suffer for their beliefs... I say that as a white man. I also say this...I shouldn't have a say in what a random woman does with her body. The only women I should be involved with is my wife (if she gives me the option) and my daughters (which I don't have).

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    What right could be more intimate and involiable than that of bodily autonomy? And such what sin could be greater than to deny it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    First the GOP (Guardians Of Pedophiles) the most sacred right is apparently the right to rape amd murder children without facing any form of prosecution. The idea that a sitting President can't be tried should have gone out he window the same second that evidence became available that said President has raped and murdered children became available. These monsters are getting away with horrific crimes against children and being protected by one of only two major political parties - for the sole reason that they are wealthy. As long as the Epstein criminals walk free, JUSTICE is dead in America. No one should be prosecuted for any crimes until all Epstein criminals are investigated, tried, ans executed. Yes, executed, especially the ones that are accused of murdering unwanted infant offspring of their hellish liaisons. If that offends you, I don't care. If an Epstein accused is found guilty of raping children - execute them - preferably in public - to insure that anyone else considering committing those crimes is very solidly convinced to not do so. Especially, those also accused of murder...

    I got banned from Reddit for that opinion...Will Lemmy defend the pedophiles too and accuse me of calling for "political" violence. Notice that I called for trials first. That's how the American legal system works. You have s trial, you carry out a sentence. The death penalty is legal in the US.. That's not political based on a party. If Bill Clinton is guilty execute him too. If Bill Gates is guilty, sharpen a guillotine. If it's Donald Trump - do it twice - because his name appears in the Epstein files almost as much as Epstein. If that opinion offends you, I don't care. You should be offended that the sitting President of the United States is being protected from investigation by his political allies on both sides of the aisle. He's being told that he can commit any crime, and NO ONE can stop him! He said he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and people would still vote for him...and his enablers are going out of their way to prove that he was correct. It's absolutely disgusting! The acts listed on those files are beyond heinous and anyone defending the perpetrators had better have an iron stomach just to read the accusations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago

    All MAGA can think about are reasons to kill people, and steal more money. That's political leadership for these psychopaths.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Save babies. Kill women.

    Sounds pretty spot on for conservatives. Oops. Forgot one.

    Save babies. Kill women. Put children to work.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    This could backfire on them, I recall several years back reading a study in which anti-abortion sentiment plummeted the moment subjects were asked whether the pregnant woman herself should be punished (not even executed, just punished) for getting an abortion.

    It's an interesting bit of cognitive dissonance, the sentiment seemed to be "yeah, abortion is murder, the doctor's a murderer, but the person who hired him to do that murder is an innocent victim who must be protected."

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    Fuuuuuuck these clickbait headlines

    Nothing got "slammed", some random person on the internet hated the idea

    I hate it too, I'm sure everyone hates it, but nothing got slammed, nobody shook the earth

    Can we PLEASE stop it with the clickbait headlines? I'm about one more clickbait post away from just no longer reading the news as everything seems to be written by an AI pretending to be an edgy 15 year old.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Fucking insane

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Creating hypothesis, empirical testing slammed as 'Scientific method'

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    welcome to Talibannessee

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago
    [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)
  • 14 comments in c/atheism@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 36 points 8 months ago

    Nothing says prolife like a little killing.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    The legal system is flawed. The state should never be allowed to kill because the legal system can be wrong. Anyone who doesn't understand that needs to learn the lesson quickly.

    Ergo, anyone who supports the state murdering people should be murdered by the state.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Wait… if you believe people who believe the state should be murdering people should be murdered by the state, doesn’t that mean you also believe the state should be murdering people? 🧐

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I'm not sure if I understood: "Abortionists should be murdered"

    Is that the point you're trying to make?

    I could be entirely wrong, if so, could you please restate more clearly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Nope, other way around.

    The state should never murder anyone. That's the whole point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Do Christians not read their Bible?

    Jesus's condemnation of the death penalty is one of the best known stories in the Gospels.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Gilead is coming. That's not hyperbole.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago

    Reinstating medieval "Christian" "sharia", is all.

    ( misogyny as the "gateway drug" of fascism )

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2445637#abstract


    As the Christian bible's Alpha & Omega would say, given the evidence in their Rev book: "those who call themselves Christian, but are not".

    9 “I know how you are suffering and how poor you are (though in fact you are rich!), and I know the insults of those who call themselves Jews but aren’t — on the contrary, they are a synagogue of the Adversary."

    from https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+2%3A9&version=CJB

    The label "Jews" was appropriate in biblical-times ( & now, in Netanyahu's "Israel", which Jeremiah & Isaiah both identify as .. likely to be torched by their-G-D ), but now we have to use the label "Christians", as well: times have changed.

    Rub their noses in their own bible, not that it'll make ANY difference:

    people with ideology & without integrity won't accept any evidence contradicting their unfalsifiable-belief/axioms, as has always been true.

    _ /\ _

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [S] 20 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Religion as a force of good...

    Also don't forget the bible prescribes bitter water for abortions, hypocrites.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    They had plants that were abortificants back then too. Idk if they used pennyroyal but probably. I have heard they mention it. But pennyroyal is a mint, causes abortions safely, according to an nih article about it that was removed and now only an article saying it's not safe appears, but conflates use of the herb, which is safe, with the oil, which is very much not safe, (volatile oils form plants are distilled and many many times as potent as decoctions of herb.)

    2021 is around when the NIH article go the switcheroo, right in the enshitification, clearly political interference if you ask me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Politicians who lie to and steal from their constituents should be executed. Sounds just as ridiculous. Also the Bible was written by and edited many times by man to control the masses. Very little of what Jesus actually said made it into the Bible because it goes against the narrative of control.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago
    [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Every time these fools utter the name Jesus I want to pull a Will Smith. Keep his name out yo mouth!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    You can't kill babies?! We need babies. Therefore we are going to kill you!

    Make the world make sense please. I can't wait until it's a crime to be religious. Pendulum swings both ways fuckers!

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/pravda_news@news.abolish.capital view that post
    [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Same people run insurance companies that don't consider a child born with any medical complications 'a viable person' until 6 weeks, and refuse to pay for any medical procedures until then.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    How many of these (R) talking-scroats have underaged skeletons in their closet? Maybe it's time they're brought to light? Who says this stuff on a podium unless they're unhinged with a wake of evidence?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    What a nut job. Poor tennesee

  • source