wooo! Ubuntu!
post
Who runs a full desktop on these things
Linux is pretty common in embedded devices. For example information screens in buses in my city (Kraków) which display stuff like next stops, OSM map, time, etc. run some kind of customized Linux distribution I think, and you can often see bunch of Tuxes along with console output when it boots up.
Sadly, Windows is also common in signage. Why ever.
It's literally in every display you see in the world. OEMs stopped fucking with Windows years ago.
Go to any fast food restaurants with those vertical displays? Linux.
Check-in kiosks that have been deployed in the past 5 years? Linux.
Your router, most platforms you interact with online, media devices, cars (they should be using RTOS, but many use Debian), movie theaters, POS systems...
Linux is the most deployed OS on this planet by far. I'm kind of annoyed when people don't realize this.
I actually hate when engineers are just letting a desktop sit like this. It's sloppy and unnecessary.
Right, the thing that caught my eye was running a full desktop OS for a sign board.
The display in the underground trains of Munich and Nuremberg still uses windows. It's such a pet peeve of mine, why would they pay for a license for such a simple use case?
Bold of you to assume they are paying for a license
Otherwise they’re an easy target for some fines, I think. It’s rather they pay the licence and nobody cares the money is wasted. And funnelled to the US, instead of staying locally.
I saw this windows-based display just last week. Either something went wrong activating it or they don't pay

They probably paid for some long ago, and don't want to pay again for updated versions of everything. They could probably even get away running stuff on Wine 🤣
engineers are just letting
That’s a bold claim cotton, I’m sure there are no project managers, middle managers, or executives involved
Tbf it is a lot easier to just leave the DE running than try to tweak a non DE env, especially for media playing.
Also it is probably easier for whatever IT technician to use this thing, update content, do troubleshooting, etc.
I imagine an IT technician running around pressing keys on real physical keyboards connected to all machines, instead of connecting via ssh, or even using Ansible.
Yeah this was what I was trying to get across to the other reply here. That tech is probably using VNC or something, rather than a shell over ssh. And they follow what I imagine are very bad docs from whoever built this thing, click on this, click on that, click loop video, click enable fullscreen.
And that was probably a requirement for the devs to deliver it that way. Because they know what kind of techs that customer hires to maintain these things. And anyone comfortable with Linux and the CLI is not applying for this technician job. (lol I’m making a lot of assumptions here. AITA?) This is the story I have created in my mind about this broken kiosk and I’m sticking to it.
Well, then they hire based on paying the lowest, then yeah, you get amateurs who don’t know shit. Can’t tell you how many situations I’ve encountered in environments like government, educational, etc. facilities where I.T. is run by the cheapest labor available. And the net result is everything runs piecemeal and haphazardly. Oh, and the average user has WAY too much privilege because they have no idea how to properly restrict access. I see it often.
I’m willing to cry over all this, I cannot understand why it works like that. It’s not cheaper, and even if you’re optimising costs, it’s still cheaper to hire one competent guy than ten incompetent ones.
I disagree. Using a DE is more 'intuitive', but using CLI commands I way easier and effective, if you know the commands. A couple of scripts can run on cron schedules and you can just forget about it until it breaks (if it ever breaks).
For a dev/engineer/linux user, I agree. For the IT technician who probably mostly works with Windows fixing printer drivers, who every now and then has to go change the ad content on the kiosks, he probably curses “that damn Linux” every time. I’m betting for him the CLI is not easier.
As an engineer who actually made one of these systems, can confirm management drove the use of Ubuntu desktop
The transit information around here is all running some janky ass kernel from 20 years ago, and sure, it works, until it don't. I appreciate the effort and all, but damn I wish they'd take shit more seriously.
for some reason, all these devices i see around these days seem to run android (one of 5/6/7/8 based on the exposed ui) or win10.. haven't seen any linux desktop-ish thing here
Yep. Even a lot of the cheap little game consoles and shit you get from China run some variety of Linux.
They had to reset my screen in the airplane once, booted into Linux too 👍🏼
a kinda old Ubuntu version ngl.
With Microsoft destroying it's reputation for very long device support, I can only imagine they've also destroyed all trust in them from the embedded devices and outdoors hardware industry. These machines don't get a lot of updates and it would suck to have to throw them away because software support ended.
Imagine running thunderbird and firefox on an info board
cual aeropuerto es eso?
In my city's history, there's a TV that has a TV box running Ubuntu. It's always on the home screen
I think my bus runs openbsd or Linux too!
Ubuntu
Ew.
All my airport signs run Arch, BTW.
1 comment