Paywall removed https://archive.is/CVRiy

top 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 89 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's not theft. It's copying or copyright infringement.

If it was theft, the owners wouldn't have it anymore.

The words matter because they change your moral intuition about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    It will be interesting to see how the MPAA tackles Hotfile now that they are restricted in the language they can use. It probably means that the term “copyright infringement” will be used more often than they had hoped.

    To be continued.

    This was written back in 2013. Does anyone know how that shook out?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 8 months ago* (7 children)

    The Verge needs to stop making articles like this.

    Fucking idiots want to ruin a good thing

    .... Or they're trying to?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, it feels like a “loose lips sink ships” situation… But on the other side of the same coin, there’s no way the TV providers were ignorant of this. They undoubtedly already knew, so it’s not like this article is going to bring anything new to light. If anything, it may put a target on the backs of some of the people who were quoted in the article for litigation, but that’s not going to actually stop the boxes from being sold in the long term.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    lets be honest though. piracy used to be seen as this super complicated thing hackers did. now that the average grandma has tasted the sweet nectar of free media, nobody is going back. what the State doesn't want you to know is that if enough people stop complying with laws, then they lose the capability to be able to enforce them. eventually- too many people won't respect the laws and regardless of the consequences on paper there will be no consequence in practice. there are too few police officers in the united states- even with over policing and mass incarceration what it is, to be able to enforce this.

    The market is just going to have to get realistic and realize that you can't nickle and dime people in the era of mass market, high bandwidth, telecommunications.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    The companies definitely know. Knowledge levels, insights, and interdiction capabilities vary by company, but every media company knows about boxes like this, and the dude at the gas station who will sell you a thumb drive with movies on it, and the secondary markets for stolen passwords, usenet, kodi, and the hundreds of other ways.

    Source: I worked in such a company for a kotra years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 12 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    It would be nice if I could know how to use these services without some "box" or "app"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 8 months ago

    The article explains that the key services are tied to the hardware & probably controlled (with an attempt at plausible deniability) by the hardware vendors.

    Guess someone now needs to come up with a a way to pirate these pirate services 😁

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    LibreElec installed on a raspberry pi 4 with a real debrid sub will get you pretty much the same thing for less money.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    you wouldn't download a television

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    I wouldn't mind learning all this magic, seems interesting

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Way ahead of you here. Stopped watching TV entirely in the early 1990s.

  • source
  • 46 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 81 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    As always piracy is a symptom not the problem. People pirate when a) they don't have enough money or b) the experience for paying customers is significantly worse than for pirates, or c) the price of services far exceeds their perceived value. Piracy was down for a while because Netflix and Hulu were relatively cheap (or free), ad free, and the economy was doing OK so most people had a little disposable income.

    Now that we're in a recession that's starting to look like it might turn into a depression and Netflix and Hulu (and others) have cranked the prices of their services up and stuffed them full of ads, yeah I'm not in the least surprised to see piracy surging. Every time you turn around there's another email from some service letting you know they're raising prices another couple bucks a month, and a bunch of people cancel their subscriptions and start sailing the high seas.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 8 months ago

    I stopped pirating when we got a Netflix sub for reasonably cheap.

    I started pirating again when I realized we were subbed to six different platforms, paying over $1k a year for the content, and still couldn’t watch what we wanted sometimes. The fact that I had to jump through hoops to find the thing I wanted to watch was also quite infuriating.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago*

    and D) I'm not going to give money to institutions like cable TV where a percentage of my money ends up with Fox News, or Paramount whose ownership is in bed with Trump, or Amazon and Bezos for obvious reasons. Go on down the line, fuck em all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    "You wouldn't steal a handbag. You wouldn't steal a car. You wouldn't steal a baby. You wouldn't shoot a policeman. And then steal his helmet. You wouldn't go to the toilet in his helmet. And then send it to the policeman's grieving widow. And then steal it again! Downloading films is stealing. If you do it, you will face the consequences."

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 18 points 8 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Don't do it; they're a security nightmare: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/11/is-your-android-tv-streaming-box-part-of-a-botnet/

    There are safer ways to acquire content to view.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 4 points 8 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Imagine recommending Stremio when Jellyfin exists (you can use torrentio with Jellyfin as well).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Stremio is standalone, jellyfin requires a server. I’m also not sure why you would suggest jellyfin just to run torrentio?…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Jellyfin also lets you play your local copies of media, which is way better IMO than relying on someone else to stream from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Yes, but it’s much more in depth than Stremio, is my point. You need to set up a server, and clients, general consensus is to also set up an internal VPN. Stremio is much less overhead, and many people don’t actually care about retaining the content.

    They are different beasts, both with benefits, but Stremio is going to be what most laymen are going to be comfortable with.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    News sites telling on everyone again. Snitches.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    DON'T COPY THAT FLOPPY!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Everyone is stealing The Verge.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    What's old is new again. Descramblers are back

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Oh well that's ironic

    After signing him up as a reseller, Jason’s SuperBox contact also recruited him for a unique side gig: Whenever Jason finds a SuperBox advertised for less than the company’s suggested retail price, he buys it and sells it back to the company for a premium. He says that the SuperBox maker then checks the device’s MAC address against a list of past sales and remotely deactivates all boxes it sold to the reseller who openly advertised the unauthorized discount.

    Offending sellers are then asked to pay a fine, Jason says. Consumers who happened to buy a box for the wrong price find it locked, with an onscreen warning telling them to contact their service provider. vSeeBox engages in similar practices, Mike says: “They can essentially shut off the boxes.”

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    I feel like outside of a handful of "TV Programs", the younger generation wouldn't even notice if "TV" as we know it disappeared tomorrow. Me personally whenever I visit family, "TV" is on and I'm repulsed by the level of marketing on it. Even if there's a baseball or football game on, they've made damn sure that every single frame of the game includes at least one sponsor logo.
    I know I wouldn't care. I might even celebrate.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I know someone that uses TVpass.org and thinks that it's not stealing because it's a .org and "they only give those org websites out to good people" It made me smile.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    What is stealing, let's be honest.

    Is charging a crazy amount for forced programming laced with massive amounts of advertising considered stealing? I think so.

    As far as Im concerned copying something is not theft.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Theft has a very specific definition, critically it requires the taking of something so that someone else is permenantly deprived of the thing. When something is cloned or copied its not theft, its all intellectual law driven so copyright and trademark breaches. No one is deprived of the product, only potentially the payment for a service.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    Having not used one of these (and being extremely leery of putting one on my network), does using a pi-hole with a custom blocklist for these things help? I’ve considered getting one and isolating it in its own subnet, but I only know enough to be dangerous.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Why is TV so expensive in USA? People just taking on so many subs?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I found a website called yarrlist.net to watch movies and tv shows, and I thought it was great! but someone told me I was putting myself at risk by using it. Basically they said I shouldn't use my bank/credit card while having those tabs open. I'm not very tech savvy so I don't understand the risk.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Yargggggg the subscription and AI slop trash

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Do you want to contribute to a botnet? Because those rogue streaming boxes are how you contribute to a botnet.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub view that post
    [–] 1 point 9 months ago